2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined neutralization–adsorption system for the disposal of hydrothermally altered excavated rock producing acidic leachate with hazardous elements

Abstract: Hydrothermally altered rock excavated in a tunnel project produces acidic leachate containing hazardous elements that include arsenic (As), lead (Pb), copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn). To mitigate this problem, this paper evaluated a combined neutralization-adsorption system that used readily available and cheap reagents like calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) and partly-weathered volcanic ash. Batch neutralization experiments showed that CaCO 3 was effective in raising the pH of the leachate around neutral while the batch … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implications of our study are relevant because they could reveal specific metal-mineral associations and dissipate doubts about metal transport and storage in AMD-affected soils and sediments. The relevance of our results can also expand to other environments where amorphous Al-Fe phases play an important role in metal mobility, such as naturally contaminated rocks, aquifers and soils [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The implications of our study are relevant because they could reveal specific metal-mineral associations and dissipate doubts about metal transport and storage in AMD-affected soils and sediments. The relevance of our results can also expand to other environments where amorphous Al-Fe phases play an important role in metal mobility, such as naturally contaminated rocks, aquifers and soils [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Igarashi et al (2020), for example, noted that the removal of Cu 2þ and Zn 2þ in AMDs occurred via their coprecipitation with HFOs rather than as distinct and separate Cuand Zn-oxide minerals. Similarly, the bulk of Cu in the strongly adsorbed fraction was most probably associated with HFOs like goethite, which are well-known for their strong heavy metal sorption capacities above around pH 7.5 (Park et al, 2019;Tabelin et al, 2014c;Tatsuhara et al, 2012;Violante et al, 2003;Veiga et al, 1991). According to Hua et al (2012), adsorbed Cu 2þ on goethite are not readily mobilised because it forms inner sphere complexes that have intrinsic adsorption rate constant about two orders of magnitude higher than the intrinsic desorption rate constant.…”
Section: Solid-phase Partitioning Of Copper Lead Zinc and Arsenic Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mining, mineral processing and tunnel/underground construction for roads and railways often generate large amounts of wastes that contain sulfide minerals such as pyrite (FeS 2 ) and arsenopyrite (FeAsS), which produce acid mine drainage (AMD) when exposed to the environment [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. AMD is very acidic and could further extract heavy metals (e.g., Fe, Cu, Zn, and Pb) from other minerals found in the wastes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%