2016
DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v26i3.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Open-Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Subtotal Thyroidectomy in a 54-year-old patient: A Case Report

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Combined open-heart surgery and thyroidectomy is a rare procedure. However, some difficulties will occur for cardiac surgery when thyromegaly extends into the retrosternal space. CASE DETAILS: A 54-year-old woman suffering from dyspnea, chest pain and decreased left ventricular function (EF=40%) was diagnosed with coronary artery disease (3 vessel disease) and became candidate for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Also, she had multinodular goiter with normal thyroid function test. After mids… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientific reports indicate the safety of simultaneous operations on the thyroid gland and coronary artery bypass grafting, inclining at the same time to perform the operation without ECC. This is to reduce the amount of heparin administered -and thus reduce the risk of bleeding [21,22,23] The undoubted downside of simultaneous surgeries is the duration of the procedure. In our case it took about 400 minutes (315-510 minutes) on average, so there is a possibility of excessive cooling of the patient or the occurrence of pressure ulcers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific reports indicate the safety of simultaneous operations on the thyroid gland and coronary artery bypass grafting, inclining at the same time to perform the operation without ECC. This is to reduce the amount of heparin administered -and thus reduce the risk of bleeding [21,22,23] The undoubted downside of simultaneous surgeries is the duration of the procedure. In our case it took about 400 minutes (315-510 minutes) on average, so there is a possibility of excessive cooling of the patient or the occurrence of pressure ulcers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Twenty publications (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) including 42 patients were reviewed based on the evaluation method summarized in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%