1997 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/asru.1997.659006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined optimisation of baseforms and model parameters in speech recognition based on acoustic subword units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (Holter and Svendsen, 1997), this was done through an iterative process of acoustic model estimation and pronunciation generation. In Ostendorf, 1999, 1998), a segmentation and clustering approach was exploited for derivation of subword units, with two main differences compared to the approaches explained in Section 2.3.1: (1) in the segmentation step, pronunciation related constraints is applied such that a given word has the same number of segments across the acoustic training data, and (2) a maximum-likelihood criteria that is consistent for both segmentation and clustering is utilized.…”
Section: Joint Approaches For Aswu Derivation and Pronunciation Genermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (Holter and Svendsen, 1997), this was done through an iterative process of acoustic model estimation and pronunciation generation. In Ostendorf, 1999, 1998), a segmentation and clustering approach was exploited for derivation of subword units, with two main differences compared to the approaches explained in Section 2.3.1: (1) in the segmentation step, pronunciation related constraints is applied such that a given word has the same number of segments across the acoustic training data, and (2) a maximum-likelihood criteria that is consistent for both segmentation and clustering is utilized.…”
Section: Joint Approaches For Aswu Derivation and Pronunciation Genermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, interest in acoustic subword unit (ASWU) based lexicon development emerged from the pronunciation variation modeling perspective, specifically with the idea of overcoming limitation of linguistically motivated subword units, i.e., phones (Lee et al, 1988;Svendsen et al, 1989;Paliwal, 1990;Lee et al, 1988;Bacchiani and Ostendorf, 1998;Holter and Svendsen, 1997). However, recently, there has been a renewed interest from the perspective of handling lexical resource constraints (Singh et al, 2000;Hartmann et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper aims to find a subword unit suitable for spontaneous speech recognition. Similar to our approach, some studies [13][14][15][16][17] have attempted to overcome the limitations of the phoneme unit. These studies focused on automatically deriving subword units from speech signals and constructing a lexicon based on them; this was done to build the subword unit using a data-driven, rather than hand-crafted approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13,14], approaches based on maximum likelihood criterion are proposed. In [15], the authors provide a hierarchical Bayesian model to jointly learn the subword units and pronunciations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%