Combined performance of screening and variable selection methods in ultra-high dimensional data in predicting time-to-event outcomes

Abstract

Background: Building prognostic models of clinical outcomes is an increasingly important research task and will remain a vital area in genomic medicine. Prognostic models of clinical outcomes are usually built and validated utilizing variable selection methods and machine learning tools. The challenges, however, in ultra-high dimensional space are not only to reduce the dimensionality of the data, but also to retain the important variables which predict the outcome. Screening approaches, such as the sure independence screening (SIS), iterative SIS (ISIS) and principled SIS (PSIS) have been developed to overcome the challenge of high dimensionality. We are interested in identifying important single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and integrating them into a validated prognostic model of overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. While the abovementioned variable selection approaches have theoretical justification in selecting SNPs, the comparison and the performance of these combined methods in predicting time-to-event outcomes have not been previously studied in ultra-high dimensional space with hundreds of thousands of variables. Methods: We conducted a series of simulations to compare the performance of different combinations of variable selection approaches and classification trees, such as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (ALASSO) and random survival forest (RSF), in ultra-high dimensional setting data for the purpose of developing prognostic models for a time-to-event outcome that is subject to censoring. The variable selection methods were evaluated for discrimination (Harrell’s concordance statistic), calibration and overall performance. In addition, we applied these approaches to 498,081 SNPs from 623 Caucasian patients with prostate cancer. Results: When n=300, ISIS-LASSO and ISIS-ALASSO chose all the informative variables which resulted in the highest Harrell’s c-index (>0.80). On the other hand, with a small sample size (n=150), ALASSO performed better than any other combinations as demonstrated by the highest c-index and/or overall performance, although there was evidence of overfitting. In analyzing the prostate cancer data, ISIS-ALASSO, SIS-LASSO, and SIS-ALASSO combinations achieved the highest discrimination with c-index of 0.67. Conclusions: Choosing the appropriate variable selection method for training a model is a critical step in developing a robust prognostic model. Based on the simulation studies, the effective use of ALASSO or a combination of methods, such as ISIS-LASSO and ISIS-ALASSO, allows both for the development of prognostic models with high predictive accuracy and a low risk of overfitting assuming moderate sample sizes.

A 4-gene signature predicts prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma

“…To identify important dysregulated genes associated with USC outcomes, we used LASSO and Cox regression analysis. LASSO is widely applied in modeling high-dimensional data and avoids overfitting risk and improves prediction accuracy [ 41 ]. Our analysis generated a 4-gene signature for predicting USC OS by calculating each patient’s risk score.…”

A 4-gene Signature Predicts Prognosis of Uterine Serous Carcinoma

“…To identify important dysregulated genes associated with USC outcomes, we used LASSO and Cox regression analysis. LASSO is widely applied in modeling high-dimensional data and avoids over tting risk and improves prediction accuracy (42). Our analysis generated a 4-gene signature for predicting USC OS by calculating each patient's risk score.…”

A 7‐lncRNA signature predict prognosis of Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma

“…[24][25][26] Some lncRNAs were believed to be a useful prognostic factor to predict prognosis in UCEC patients, such as FER1L4 and BLACAT1. 27 31 The Cox proportional hazard regression model is the most popular method of survival time-covariate information model. 32 Also, we combined the 7-lncRNA signature with some clinicopathological parameters to establish a prognosis nomogram, which has an excellent predictive effect.…”