2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40242-019-8353-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined QSAR/QSPR, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Study of Environmentally Friendly PBDEs with Improved Insulating Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As per the results in Table 3 , the optimal principal component n of PAEs’ multi-effect CoMSIA model was 10, while the cross-validation coefficient q 2 was 0.616 (generally considered that when the value of q 2 > 0.5, the model has the credible predictive ability [ 38 , 39 ]). The non-cross-validation coefficient r 2 was 1.000 (>0.9), SEE was 0.008, and F was 507.314, indicating the greater fitting ability and robustness of the model [ 40 , 41 ]. The external test coefficient r 2 pred was 0.66 (>0.6), and SEP of the test set was 0.16, which specified the model also had well predictive ability [ 42 , 43 ] and the constructed CoMSIA model met the requirements [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per the results in Table 3 , the optimal principal component n of PAEs’ multi-effect CoMSIA model was 10, while the cross-validation coefficient q 2 was 0.616 (generally considered that when the value of q 2 > 0.5, the model has the credible predictive ability [ 38 , 39 ]). The non-cross-validation coefficient r 2 was 1.000 (>0.9), SEE was 0.008, and F was 507.314, indicating the greater fitting ability and robustness of the model [ 40 , 41 ]. The external test coefficient r 2 pred was 0.66 (>0.6), and SEP of the test set was 0.16, which specified the model also had well predictive ability [ 42 , 43 ] and the constructed CoMSIA model met the requirements [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal principal component (n) of the comprehensive effect CoMSIA model is 6, and the cross-validation coefficient (q 2 ) is 0.747 (>0.5) ( Table 3 ), indicating that the prediction ability of the developed model has a certain degree of credibility. The non-cross validation coefficient (R 2 ) is 0.929 (>0.9), the standard deviation (SEE) is 0.100, and the F value is 26.209, indicating that the model exhibits good fitting ability and robustness [ 37 , 38 ]. The model has certain reliability and universality in the prediction of the PAEs’ comprehensive effect value with insulation, toxicity, and bioconcentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other performance metrices evaluated were the standard error of estimate and Fischer's value which were 0.067 and 192.02 and 0.015 and 1528.55 for CoMFA and CoMSIA1 models respectively. Furthermore, the non-cross validation coefficients were all greater than 0.90, indicating strong adaptability and robustness of the developed models [31,32]. The correlation between the predicted value and the actual value of training set and test set r2 were 0.9896 and 0.9997 in CoMFA (Figure 3F), and correlation between the predicted value and the actual value of training set and test set r2 were 0.9996 and 0.9997 in CoMSIA1, indicating that the model had good predictive ability.…”
Section: Ld 50 3d-qsarmentioning
confidence: 92%