2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined short and long-delay tandem shock waves to improve shock wave lithotripsy according to the Gilmore–Akulichev theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, because of their proximity to the canal walls, the emitted shock waves are still propagating at super-sonic speeds as they reach the smear layer, potentially increasing the cleaning mechanism even further. The proposed SWEEPS technique shares similarities with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), where focused ultrasonic waves are used to break kidney stones into smaller pieces [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, because of their proximity to the canal walls, the emitted shock waves are still propagating at super-sonic speeds as they reach the smear layer, potentially increasing the cleaning mechanism even further. The proposed SWEEPS technique shares similarities with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), where focused ultrasonic waves are used to break kidney stones into smaller pieces [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A useful tool to estimate the size of bubbles immersed in a liquid versus the time after their interaction with a shock wave is the Gilmore-Akulichev equation [50]. By obtaining the maximum diameter of shock wave-exposed bubbles using high-speed imaging, it is possible to calculate their initial size, the approximate diameter of the microjets emitted after collapse, and the delay to enhance the collapse energy of these specific bubbles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It results in more vigorous shock waves and enhanced photoacoustic streaming compared to that in PIPS mode [27,28]. The shock wave and enhanced photoacoustic streaming can pump out the infectious material in the more hidden parts of the canal, achieving a better irrigation efficacy compared to that with PIPS [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%