2005
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2004.841237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined State Estimation and Measurement Calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter work integrates synchronized measurement calibration process causing several distinct sources of errors [13]. The calibration of the measurement problem and secondary of it are detailed [14,15]. Nevertheless, implementation and performance details are not endowed.…”
Section: State-of-the Art Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter work integrates synchronized measurement calibration process causing several distinct sources of errors [13]. The calibration of the measurement problem and secondary of it are detailed [14,15]. Nevertheless, implementation and performance details are not endowed.…”
Section: State-of-the Art Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One appends the unknown parameters to the state vector x and then solves a least-squares problem as the one given by Eq. (3) [11][12][13][14][15] or uses a Kalman filter instead [16,17]. Both methods can be combined in a two-stage process: First it is detected which network parameters are subject to errors and then the respective parameters are estimated by augmentation.…”
Section: State and Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods were previously proposed to deal with missing or erroneous information about the grid topology and parameter [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. These approaches extend the basic idea of state estimation, removing some knowledge about the topology and adding some uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrupted measurements may appear from failures either in measurement devices or in the communication process of the collected data . When caused by uncalibrated measuring instruments, BD are not of large magnitude and may be considered ordinary by the model of the random errors established in Equation . On the other hand, communication errors can be substantial, compromising SE results.…”
Section: Treatment Of Corrupted Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%