Abstract:REFERENCES
Combined subarachnoid and epidural block for Caesarean sectionTo the Editor: I would be grateful for the use of your columns to comment on the letter from Dr. Rawal.l The single-space double-needle technique has been described previously 2 .~ and 1 would like to mention our modifiation of the technique.'* This involves clamping the spinal needle with a light-weight artery clip at the point where it enters the Tuohy needle. This avoids the difficulty commonly encountered with a long flexible needle, … Show more
“…This can be explained by the reduced CSF volume caused by epidural venous engorgement and increased block of nerve fibers to local anesthetics. 17 When using the needle-through-needle technique in cesarean delivery, much smaller doses of spinal anesthetic may be possible compared with single-injection. 14,15 One possible explanation for this reduced requirement of spinal anesthetic for cesarean delivery with the needle-through-needle technique is that the epidural pressure becomes atmospheric and this change in pressure somehow interferes with the circulation and volume of the CSF and, hence, better spread.…”
We could not achieve satisfactory surgical analgesia with 8 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine injected into the subarachnoid space using the needle-through-needle technique in cesarean deliveries. An epidural saline injection elevated the sensory level, which did not improve the spinal block, whereas an epidural injection of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine enhanced the spinal block and sustained the block postoperatively.
“…This can be explained by the reduced CSF volume caused by epidural venous engorgement and increased block of nerve fibers to local anesthetics. 17 When using the needle-through-needle technique in cesarean delivery, much smaller doses of spinal anesthetic may be possible compared with single-injection. 14,15 One possible explanation for this reduced requirement of spinal anesthetic for cesarean delivery with the needle-through-needle technique is that the epidural pressure becomes atmospheric and this change in pressure somehow interferes with the circulation and volume of the CSF and, hence, better spread.…”
We could not achieve satisfactory surgical analgesia with 8 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine injected into the subarachnoid space using the needle-through-needle technique in cesarean deliveries. An epidural saline injection elevated the sensory level, which did not improve the spinal block, whereas an epidural injection of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine enhanced the spinal block and sustained the block postoperatively.
“…Demgegenüber finden sich nur spärliche Hinweise zur Dosierungsempfehlung sowohl für die initiale spinale Applikation als auch für die epidurale Nachinjektion, die die Analgesie vertieft oder die segmentale Wirkung ausdehnt, also eine "Augmentation" [3,4,7,16,22,23,26,27]. In mehreren Arbeiten wurden Varianten zur Durchführung vor allem bei der Sectio caesarea beschrieben, deren Schwerpunkte allerdings eher technischen Details zugewandt waren.…”
Section: Schlüsselwörterunclassified
“…Ihr häufigstes Einsatzgebiet ist die operative Schnittentbindung [3,4,7,16,22,23,26,27]. Ihr häufigstes Einsatzgebiet ist die operative Schnittentbindung [3,4,7,16,22,23,26,27].…”
Section: Op-bereitschaft/analgesieunclassified
“…Dennisson [7] erwähnt nur die Anwendung in 5% bei insgesamt 400 untersuchten Fällen. Dennisson [7] erwähnt nur die Anwendung in 5% bei insgesamt 400 untersuchten Fällen.…”
Section: Op-bereitschaft/analgesieunclassified
“…Dennisson verwendet 7,5 bis 8 mg Bupivacain isobar und erreicht in 95% eine Höhe von Th4 bis Th2 [7]. Anders als in der aEA-Gruppe erfolgte die Dosisbemessung für die Nachinjektion ausschließlich nach der Körpergröße, da es sich hier um die erste epidurale Injektion während des Anästhesieverlaufs handelte.…”
The extension of anaesthesia achieved in epidural anaesthesia after an initial dose of 101.8 mg bupivacaine and augmenting dose of 99 mg lidocaine reached the segment Th5. The primary spinal anaesthesia dose up to 15 mg corresponding to height led to a segmental extension to a maximum of Th3 under CSE. Augmentation was necessary in 13 patients; in 5 cases because of inadequate extent of anaesthesia and 8 cases because of pain resulting from premature reversion. The augmenting dose required was 13.9 ml. Readiness for operation was attained after 19.8 min (aEA) and after 10.5 min (CSE). No patient required analgesics before delivery. The additional analgesic requirement during operation was 63.6% (aEA) and 39.1% (CSE). Taking into account pain in the area of surgery, the requirement of analgesics was 50% (aEA) vs. 17.4% (CSE). Antiemetics were required in 18.2 (aEA) and in 65.2% (CSE). The systolic blood pressure fell by 17.7% (aEA) and in 30.3% (CSE). The minimum systolic pressure was observed after 13.4 min in aEA, and after 9.5 min in CSE. The APGAR score and the umbilical pH did not show any differences. General anaesthesia was not required in any case.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.