2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined supramolecular and mesoscale modelling of liquid–liquid extraction of rare earth salts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 Note that such considerations are only able to provide a qualitative description of the extraction trends, but they fail completely in quantitative assessment. 38…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36,37 Note that such considerations are only able to provide a qualitative description of the extraction trends, but they fail completely in quantitative assessment. 38…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 The predictive power of this decomposition has been illustrated successfully in three cases with a focus on the simple case of one uncharged complexing extractant without any synergy. 38,45,46 An explicit parametric study has shown in the case of uncharged extractant that this ienaic approach is able to link quantitatively the observed free energy of transfer controlling the yield of the process to the complexation free energy that is determined in supramolecular chemistry. 39 This ienaic approach, evaluating the various relevant interactions is extended here to the common case of acidic extractants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a quantitative evaluation requires to abandon the concept of average stoichiometry and consider a Boltzmann distribution of complexing aggregates in dynamic equilibrium [47]. Since, the selectivity also depends on pH, it also shows the impact of interfacial curvature frustration that depends on the total volume of all the hydrophilic extracted species in each aggregate [48,49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously reported values of adjusted κ* for reverse aggregates were 2.5 k B T per DMDOHEMA molecule. 25 , 26 Recently, a molecular dynamics study done by our group provided a value of 16 k B T per extractant molecule in heptane solvent. 27 This value points to very high curvature toward water (in the reverse micelles) and was attributed to the strong interactions of Eu 3+ and DMDOHEMA molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term − k B T ln D Eu 3+ is often referred to as the apparent energy of the extraction. 26 In Figure 9 , the assumption complexation = extraction (a green dashed line) is plotted for purpose of easier understanding of the context. Figures 9 a−b show the − k B T ln D Eu 3+ / k B T for a system = 0.1 mol dm –3 and = 1 mol dm –3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%