2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-10315-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined thermal analysis of fluid plasticizers

Abstract: The paper deals with the study of plasticizers using different thermal methods. The literature data on the melting points of plasticizers proved uncertain; we intended to gather the data by other methods, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and thermally stimulated discharge (TSD). Results of ten plasticizers are demonstrated. During this work, we found that most of plasticizers have no well-defined melting point, and the solidification of plasticizer is similar to the gl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…157 °C) and a previously reported value for DIDP (T g ≈ −64 °C). 54 Intriguingly, the corresponding plot of the calculated T g values against the weight fraction of the added plasticizer shows that the experimental values are significantly lower than expected for a DIDP content of up to 5 wt % (Figure 3d, circles), which is in stark contrast to reported T g values for samples of poly(vinyl chloride) plasticized with DIDP 59 or di(2-ethylhexyl phthalate) 60 (DEHP; T g ≈ −85 °C) 54 and the values calculated with the Fox equation (Figure S10). Even at the lowest plasticizer concentrations, for which one can assume complete miscibility, we observe a pronounced deviation from the behavior predicted based on the Fox equation.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…157 °C) and a previously reported value for DIDP (T g ≈ −64 °C). 54 Intriguingly, the corresponding plot of the calculated T g values against the weight fraction of the added plasticizer shows that the experimental values are significantly lower than expected for a DIDP content of up to 5 wt % (Figure 3d, circles), which is in stark contrast to reported T g values for samples of poly(vinyl chloride) plasticized with DIDP 59 or di(2-ethylhexyl phthalate) 60 (DEHP; T g ≈ −85 °C) 54 and the values calculated with the Fox equation (Figure S10). Even at the lowest plasticizer concentrations, for which one can assume complete miscibility, we observe a pronounced deviation from the behavior predicted based on the Fox equation.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) Plot of the experimentally determined and calculated glass transition temperature ( T g ) against the weight fraction of the added plasticizer in the metallosupramolecular polymer. A previously reported T g value of DIDP that was determined by DMA measurements was used for the calculation of expected T g values with the Fox equation. The shown DSC traces and SAXS/WAXS scattering profiles are vertically shifted for clarity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), further correction was not applied. The depolarization current of the borosilicate filter is less than 1 pA until 0 °C and less than 5 pA at 50 °C [14].…”
Section: Thermally Stimulated Discharge (Tsd)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For TSD measurements, 60 gm −2 borosilicate glass fiber filter of 0.2 mm thickness and 2.6 μm nominal pore size and 87 ± 2% pore volume (SIGMA F7769) was used as scaffolding material described in [13,14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation