1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00121-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined treatment with temporary short-term high dose rate Iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for irradiation of localized prostatic carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reassuring the overall frequency and severity of the reported AE was low, and it are comparable to other prospective brachytherapy studies. (6,(21)(22)(23) This is also comparable to other prospective HDR brachytherapy studies. Borghede et al reported on the results of 50 patients treated with 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy combined with 2 HDR brachytherapy implants delivering a total dose of 20 Gy (2 fractions).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is reassuring the overall frequency and severity of the reported AE was low, and it are comparable to other prospective brachytherapy studies. (6,(21)(22)(23) This is also comparable to other prospective HDR brachytherapy studies. Borghede et al reported on the results of 50 patients treated with 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy combined with 2 HDR brachytherapy implants delivering a total dose of 20 Gy (2 fractions).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The median number of patients accrued per institution was 8 (range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and the average was 9 patients. The average monthly accrual for the study was 5.9 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publications on prostate cancer patients treated with conventional fractionated EBRT combined with hypofractionated IMRT boosts 96 of 2 fractions of 5-8 Gy (median follow-up of 63 months) or with concomitant boosts 97,98 in 28 fractions of 2.5 Gy and 25 fractions of 2.7 Gy (median follow-up of 46 and 39 months, respectively) concluded that these treatments were feasible and well tolerated. The results on EBRT treatments in combination with HDRBT boosts 65,66,[99][100][101][102][103][104][105] with median follow-up ranging from 40 to 105 months (2 fractions  5-15 Gy, 3 fractions  3-6.5 Gy, or 4 fractions  3-6 Gy) and extreme hypofractionated treatments of HDRBT delivered as monotherapy [106][107][108][109][110][111][112] at median follow-up of 22-65 months (3 fractions  10.5 Gy, 4 fractions  8.5-9.5 Gy, 6 fractions  6.75-7 Gy, 8 fractions  6 Gy, or 9 fractions  6 Gy) or stereotactic body radiosurgery [113][114][115] 119,120 median follow-up: 32 months for the hypofractionation regimens and 35 months for the conventional). Despite differences in dose prescription, delivery methods, patient selection according to prognostic factors, short follow-up in many studies, and the use of androgen deprivation therapy in some patients, the clinical experience with hypofractionation seems to be consistent with a low a/b ratio for prostate cancer.…”
Section: Feasibility Of the Hypofractionation Regimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other HDR BT (/100 Gy) papers report 2 Á/11% grade 2Á/4 late GI toxicity [9,12,13,19], while papers reporting toxicity after conformal EBRT dose escalation (74 Á/79 Gy) [16,32 Á/34] indicate 6 Á/14% grade 2 Á/4 toxicity and papers concerning conventional/conformal EBRT (64Á/70 Gy) [17,30,35,37] report 5 Á/15%. The definition of the assessment point for late effects varies from 4 months to 24 months or more in these studies as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%