1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(98)00323-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined use of differential pulse adsorptive and anodic stripping techniques for the determination of antimony(III) and antimony(V) in zinc electrolyte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Voltammetric methods are among the electrochemical techniques described for the selective determination of antimony species. In particular, anodic stripping voltammetry [2, 8 -10], has proved effective and has also been used in the speciation of antimony following adsorptive accumulation of antimony complexes using chloranilic acid as a complexing agent [11,12].…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voltammetric methods are among the electrochemical techniques described for the selective determination of antimony species. In particular, anodic stripping voltammetry [2, 8 -10], has proved effective and has also been used in the speciation of antimony following adsorptive accumulation of antimony complexes using chloranilic acid as a complexing agent [11,12].…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they are more portable than the aforementioned techniques . The stripping voltammetric techniques including anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and adsorptive stripping voltammetry (AdSV), based on the interfacial accumulation and voltammetric determination of metal complexes [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], are those most commonly employed in the determination of antimony due to their lower detection limits. Mercury-based electrodes have been widely preferred as the working electrode in antimony determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mercury-based electrodes have been widely preferred as the working electrode in antimony determination. This is due to the ability of mercury to form amalgams with a number of metals on the electrode surface and to enhance the analytical signal associated with stripping analysis [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][52][53][54]. Many voltammetric studies, including stripping methods for determination of antimony, have focused on the modification of the electrode surface or use of a chelating/complexing agent to increase the detection limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) at mercury, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Only a few papers have been published to date on the stripping voltammetric determination of antimony in steels. [33][34][35] Wang et al 33 and Hofbauerova et al 34 used ASV at mercurybased electrodes in a hydrochloric acid-alcohol medium for the determination of antimony in steels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) at mercury, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] glassy carbon, 21 gold film, 22 and modified 23,24 electrodes in acidic solutions, adsorptive stripping voltammetry with complexing agents such as triphenylmethane dyes, 25 catechol, 26 p-dimethylaminophenyl-fluorone, 27 or chloranilic acid, 20,28 and potentiometric [29][30][31] or constant-current 21,32 stripping analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%