2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined use of empirical data and mathematical modelling to better estimate the microbial turnover of isotopically labelled carbon substrates in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be due to the microorganisms increasingly using 14 C for energy production and cell-maintenance activities (e.g., generation of heat shock proteins, membrane lipid renewal) rather than for growth and storage [41]. This result is consistent with [55], who also showed that the size of C pool a 1 was sensitive to temperature.…”
Section: Don Compounds Mineralization and Half-lifesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This could be due to the microorganisms increasingly using 14 C for energy production and cell-maintenance activities (e.g., generation of heat shock proteins, membrane lipid renewal) rather than for growth and storage [41]. This result is consistent with [55], who also showed that the size of C pool a 1 was sensitive to temperature.…”
Section: Don Compounds Mineralization and Half-lifesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Parameters a 1 and a 2 represent the size (% of total 14 C added) of the fast and slow 14 C turnover pools respectively [22,41]. k 1 is the rate constant describing the turnover rate of C pool a 1 which is ascribed to the immediate use of substrate-derived 14 C in catabolic processes (i.e., respiration).…”
Section: Rate Of 14 C-labelled Substrate Mineralization In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 40% release should not be interpreted as if only 40% of the compound was degraded, but rather that 60% of the mineralized compound was used as a carbon source for microbial 275 growth. This is a generally accepted interpretation of mineralization curves that often go to yields of only 40-50% with the remaining part incorporated into biomass that is only slowly mineralized along with microbial turnover (Nowak et Glanville et al, 2016). Just after incubation, we extracted non-degraded or metabolized BVOCs with methanol, and only sterilized samples released a major pool of methanol-extractable 14 C (typically between 50 and 95%) while non-sterilized samples released less than 5%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%