2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.99.134405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined use of translational and spin-rotational invariance for spin systems

Abstract: Exact diagonalization and other numerical studies of quantum spin systems are notoriously limited by the exponential growth of the Hilbert space dimension with system size. A common and well-known practice to reduce this increasing computational effort is to take advantage of the translational symmetry CN in periodic systems. This represents a rather simple yet elegant application of the group theoretical symmetry projection operator technique. For isotropic exchange interactions, the spin-rotational symmetry … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On classical computers, with a sophisticated and elaborated algorithm that incorporates the spatial symmetry, such as the lattice translational symmetry, and S z conservation [73,92], one can obtain the numerically exact ground state of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model up to 50 spins [93], which is far larger than the case of 16 qubits studied here. However, S 2 conservation is usually not implemented because the programming of a total-spin-preserved code is, although possible [94,95], not easy and often computationally demanding on classical computers. We expect that the circuit that operates eSWAP gates on a singlet-pair product state or on a pair-product state with higher spin-quantum numbers might be useful for studying spin-liquid states including the RVB state as well as excited states on quantum computers in the near future.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On classical computers, with a sophisticated and elaborated algorithm that incorporates the spatial symmetry, such as the lattice translational symmetry, and S z conservation [73,92], one can obtain the numerically exact ground state of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model up to 50 spins [93], which is far larger than the case of 16 qubits studied here. However, S 2 conservation is usually not implemented because the programming of a total-spin-preserved code is, although possible [94,95], not easy and often computationally demanding on classical computers. We expect that the circuit that operates eSWAP gates on a singlet-pair product state or on a pair-product state with higher spin-quantum numbers might be useful for studying spin-liquid states including the RVB state as well as excited states on quantum computers in the near future.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to impractical implementations, the total SU(2) spin symmetry of the Heisenberg model is usually not used in numerical approaches [39,97], except the work from Flocke and Karwowski [11,[98][99][100][101][102] using the symmetric group approach (SGA) [103][104][105][106][107], spin-symmetry adapted MPS/DMRG studies [108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116] and occasional ED [97,117,118] and real-space renormalization group studies [119]. Nevertheless the theoretical advantages of using a description conserving both total spin projection, m s , the total spin, S, are striking: (a) further reduction of the Hilbert space size (by additional block diagonalization of Ĥ), (b) optimization of electronic states of desired spin, and (c) separation of nearly degenerate states of different total spin.…”
Section: The Heisenberg Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the action of H on |ψ can also be calculated on the fly, we save the sparse Hamiltonian matrix for the sake of run time. Moreover, symmetries of the system can be exploited in order to split the problem into smaller subproblems and to further reduce the computational effort [80]. In this paper, we exploit the particle number (magnetization) conservation for both particle species (legs) separately.…”
Section: Time Evolution Via Pure-state Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%