2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined venomics, venom gland transcriptomics, bioactivities, and antivenomics of two Bothrops jararaca populations from geographic isolated regions within the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
80
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
8
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies on the proteomic characterization of venoms are increasingly combining identification data with functional assays of particular components, to gain deeper insights from the medical and biological perspectives [57, 8385]. The TS is conceptually identical to the ‘lethal neurotoxicity coefficient’ (LNC) defined as the ratio between the average LD 50 and the crotoxin + crotamine relative abundance (% of the total venom proteins) [50].…”
Section: Toxicovenomics: Unmasking the Villains Among The Crowdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies on the proteomic characterization of venoms are increasingly combining identification data with functional assays of particular components, to gain deeper insights from the medical and biological perspectives [57, 8385]. The TS is conceptually identical to the ‘lethal neurotoxicity coefficient’ (LNC) defined as the ratio between the average LD 50 and the crotoxin + crotamine relative abundance (% of the total venom proteins) [50].…”
Section: Toxicovenomics: Unmasking the Villains Among The Crowdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant families are secreted phospholipases A 2 (PLA2s), snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMP), snake venom serine proteases (SVSP), and three-finger peptides (3FTX), while the secondary families comprise cysteine-rich secretory proteins, Lamino acid oxidases, kunitz peptides, C-type lectins, disintegrins, and natriuretic peptides (Slagboom et al, 2017;Tasoulis and Isbister, 2017;Munawar et al, 2018). Interestingly, snake venom composition varies interspecifically (Fry et al, 2008;Tasoulis and Isbister, 2017), as well as intraspecifically, with many factors influencing this diversity including age (Dias et al, 2013), gender (Menezes et al, 2006;Zelanis et al, 2016), location (Durban et al, 2011;Goncalves-Machado et al, 2016), diet (Barlow et al, 2009), and season (Gubensek et al, 1974). This variability phenomenon underpins toxin diversity and multifunctionality, and is of great importance to be considered in antivenom production and envenomation treatment .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venomics is considered an integrative approach, that can combine proteomics, transcriptomics and/or genomics to study venoms [1]. Although the term was initially used to describe the mass spectrometry-based proteomic characterization of venoms [2,3], genomic [4,5] or more commonly venom gland transcriptomic sequencing [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] have also been used to characterize venom compositions. These molecular approaches provide an overview of venom composition by characterizing the nucleotide sequences of venom toxin-encoding genes (among others) and, in the case of transcriptomics, also provide an estimation of their relative expression in the venom gland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%