2018
DOI: 10.18782/2320-7051.5199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Ability and Gene Action in Hybrid Rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, it was observed that GCA variances were greater than SCA variances for the majority of the characters, indicating the predominance of additive gene action for the traits like Plant height, panicle length, panicle weight, number of grains per panicle, spikelet fertility percent, 1000 grain weight, kernel length, kernel breadth and kernel length-breadth ratio. The findings of Pratap et al, (2013); Samrath andDeepak, 2014 andRamesh et al, (2018) support the present results of predominance of additive positive gene action for majority of traits. The SCA variances were greater than the GCA variances for the number of productive tillers per plant, pollen fertility percent, hulling percentage, milling percentage, head rice recovery and grain yield per plant, indicating predominance of non-additive gene action.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the current study, it was observed that GCA variances were greater than SCA variances for the majority of the characters, indicating the predominance of additive gene action for the traits like Plant height, panicle length, panicle weight, number of grains per panicle, spikelet fertility percent, 1000 grain weight, kernel length, kernel breadth and kernel length-breadth ratio. The findings of Pratap et al, (2013); Samrath andDeepak, 2014 andRamesh et al, (2018) support the present results of predominance of additive positive gene action for majority of traits. The SCA variances were greater than the GCA variances for the number of productive tillers per plant, pollen fertility percent, hulling percentage, milling percentage, head rice recovery and grain yield per plant, indicating predominance of non-additive gene action.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This shows the significance for the success of these characteristics of additives and nonadditive genetic variances. These results were similar to those reported by Ramesh et al (2018), who revealed that significant GCA and SCA showed the significance for the expression of the yield traits in rice genotypes of additive and non-additive gene behavior.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variance and Mean Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus selection may be performed on the basis of mean output or GCA effects on similar productivity in order to boost economic characteristics in rice. Many investigators found significant GCA effects in positive direction for these traits in many rice genotypes under both conditions, As for Ramesh et al . ( 2018) who found that substantial additive and nonadditive gene effects for the expression of yield features in the genotypes of rice were described as important as GCA and SCA.…”
Section: General Combining Abilitymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Zewdu (2020) found that analysis of variance indicated that genotypes, general combining and specific combining abilities mean square values were highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) for all measured traits which indicated the genetic diversity of the parents and the importance of both additive and non-additive gene effects in the inheritance of the measured traits respectively. The estimate of variance due to GCA was higher than that due to SCA for these traits suggesting greater importance of additive genetic variance which is in agreement with the results of Lathaet al, (2013), Ramesh et al, (2018), El Mowafi and AbouShousha (2003), Negm, (2012) and El Mowafi et al, (2019and 2022.…”
Section: 2general Combining Abilitysupporting
confidence: 89%