2021
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2021.v56.02591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining ability for resistance to Fusarium wilt and yield in black bean

Abstract: The objective of this work was to investigate the genetic control of black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and to select parents and segregating populations with high resistance to Fusarium wilt, high yield, and greater 100-seed weight (100SW), using a partial diallel cross. Twenty-five populations were obtained from two groups of parents – the first with five parents resistant to and the second with five parents susceptible to Fusarium wilt. The segregating populations were evaluated in experiments in three years/g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The area in which the experiments were set up is routinely used for evaluating the reaction of common bean lines to Fusarium wilt, as it is highly infested with the pathogen (D. G. Pereira et al, 2019a;H. S. Pereira et al, 2016Torres et al, 2021Torres et al, , 2022. The plots were composed of two 4-m rows in 2012 and 2013 and four 4-m rows in 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The area in which the experiments were set up is routinely used for evaluating the reaction of common bean lines to Fusarium wilt, as it is highly infested with the pathogen (D. G. Pereira et al, 2019a;H. S. Pereira et al, 2016Torres et al, 2021Torres et al, , 2022. The plots were composed of two 4-m rows in 2012 and 2013 and four 4-m rows in 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traits evaluated were reaction to Fusarium wilt, grain yield, and 100-seed weight. To evaluate reaction to Fusarium wilt, the scoring scale described by Torres et al (2021) was used, ranging from 1 to 9, in which 1 represents the absence of susceptible plants; 2: 0.1-5%; 3: 5.1-10%; 4: 10.1-20%; 5: 20.1-40%; 6: 40.1-60%; 7: 60.1-80%; 8: 80.1-90%; and 9: 90.1-100%. The evaluation was performed by two persons at the R8 (grain filling) phenological stage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations