2013
DOI: 10.5376/mpb.2013.04.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Ability Studies in Maize (<i>Zea Mays</i> L.)

Abstract: The present study was conducted to assess the general combining ability effects of parents and specific combining ability effects of hybrids for yield and yield related traits and explore their use in hybrid development. 170 F 1 s generated by crossing thirty four lines with five testers were evaluated. The ratio of sca/gca variance revealed that there was preponderance of non additive gene action in the expression of all the traits under study. Inbred lines viz., MAI 708, MAI 109, MAI 111, MAI 121, Cymt 3 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the gca effects of the parents were reflected in the sca effects of the crosses in most of the studied traits. This was confirmed with the findings of Gowda et al [57], Gissa et al [58], and Ahmed et al [55], who obtained high estimates of sca from high gca parents.…”
Section: Specific Combining Ability (Sca) Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Generally, the gca effects of the parents were reflected in the sca effects of the crosses in most of the studied traits. This was confirmed with the findings of Gowda et al [57], Gissa et al [58], and Ahmed et al [55], who obtained high estimates of sca from high gca parents.…”
Section: Specific Combining Ability (Sca) Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, the magnitude of SCA was higher than GCA for plant height, number of grain per row and grain yield, indicating non-additive gene action in controlling these traits. Non-additive gene action was also reported on plant height (Kadir, 2010), number of kernel per row (Abdel-Moneam et al, 2009) and grain yield (Abdel-Moneam et al, 2009;Kadir, 2010;Barakat and Osman, 2008;Gouda et al, 2013;Hoque et al, 2016) in their study. These investigations supported the present study.…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancementioning
confidence: 52%
“…Whereas, tester BML 7 was good general combiner for plant height, ear girth and number of kernels per row. Table.3a Estimates of general combining ability (gca) effects for yield and yield component characters in maize Dar et al, (2017), Kambe Gouda et al, (2013), Shushay et al, (2013), Sumalini and Shobha Rani (2011), Gowhar Ali et al, (2007), Malik et al, (2004) and Venugopal et al, (2002) for grain yield and other component characters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%