Proceedings of SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference 2007
DOI: 10.2523/104610-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Acid- and Hydraulic-Fracturing Technologies Is the Key to Successfully Stimulating the Orito Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of applying the MC fluid in a propped fracturing treatment, the fluid sequence is similar that proposed by Rozo et al 6 However, unlike the case when a viscosified acid is used as a pre-pad in the calibration treatment after which the main treatment can be performed in a similar manner to a conventional treatment, the neutral pH of the viscosified MC fluid overcomes the potential operational drawbacks of using an acid pre-pad, which if not fully spent in the matrix, it can prematurely break the crosslinked polymer fracturing fluid. Premature breaking of the fracturing fluid can result in an underestimation of the fluid efficiency during the calibration treatment and/or prematurely screening out during the main treatment.…”
Section: The Pumping Schedulementioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of applying the MC fluid in a propped fracturing treatment, the fluid sequence is similar that proposed by Rozo et al 6 However, unlike the case when a viscosified acid is used as a pre-pad in the calibration treatment after which the main treatment can be performed in a similar manner to a conventional treatment, the neutral pH of the viscosified MC fluid overcomes the potential operational drawbacks of using an acid pre-pad, which if not fully spent in the matrix, it can prematurely break the crosslinked polymer fracturing fluid. Premature breaking of the fracturing fluid can result in an underestimation of the fluid efficiency during the calibration treatment and/or prematurely screening out during the main treatment.…”
Section: The Pumping Schedulementioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the case of hydraulic fracturing treatments the movement of the fines would account for the dramatic reduction in the retained permeability after performing a static leakoff test (Fig. 6 In this scenario the use of a conventional HCl pre-flush ahead of the main acid treatment was not considered a practical option. This dramatic reduction in the matrix permeability of the fracture faces could in turn create a fracture face skin sufficiently high to actually negatively impact the productivity of the well.…”
Section: Initial Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So the propped fracturing was introduced in some carbonate field, because of ability of deeper penetration and longer duration of fracture with proppant [1,2] , but its ability of connecting natural fracture or fissure is poor because the fracturing fluid is inert fluid, even though the fracture of fissure is essential to the productivity in carbonate formation. In this condition, not like the previously divided into 2 stages [3] , the technique which can combine the advantages of acid fracturing and propped fracturing was studied. The novel surface cross-linked acid (SXA) makes the technique possible, because it can not only readily carry proppant but also react with the carbonate formation to eliminate the formation damage and connect the natural fracture, which can maximize the drainage area and the stimulation reservoir volume (SRV), which has been proved to benefit the well productivity [4] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%