1998
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-64299-4_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining and representing logical systems using model-theoretic parchments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reader should have noticed us having avoided the classification of static versus dynamic frameworks, as proposed, for example, by the D-oids [1] and algebra transformation systems approaches [22]. Any SO language, with a suitable categorical semantics, can be used as a state language to form a new SO language.…”
Section: Types Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reader should have noticed us having avoided the classification of static versus dynamic frameworks, as proposed, for example, by the D-oids [1] and algebra transformation systems approaches [22]. Any SO language, with a suitable categorical semantics, can be used as a state language to form a new SO language.…”
Section: Types Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be also seen as a generalization of the concepts of institutions and parchments [22], in the sense that sorts in an institution form the particular case of simple types in a specification frame. As the whole theory is very rich [8], we present here its very basic principles.…”
Section: Specification Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important open question is whether and how our approach can be integrated with the work on the algebraization of logics as institutions reported in [20]. Another interesting line of future work is to study the impact of our proposal with respect to the way a logic is represented within many-sorted equational logic in the context of logic combination, namely in the lines of [17]. In any case, this seems to be an area which is very fit for application of the theory many-sorted algebras, including hidden-sorts and behavioral reasoning, as developed within the formal methods community over the last decade.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This means that the theory applies essentially only to propositionalbased logics, and that logics over many-sorted languages simply fall out of its scope. It goes without saying that rich logics, with many-sorted languages, are essential to specify and reason about complex systems, as also argued and justified by the theory of combined logics [17,19]. Herein, we propose a way to extend the scope of applicability of AAL by generalizing to the many-sorted case several of the key concepts and results of the current theory, including several alternative characterization results, namely those involving the Leibniz operator and maps of logics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%