2016
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/27/9/097001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining ART and FBP for improved fidelity of tomographic BOS

Abstract: Engine component defects along the hot-gas path (HGP) of jet engines influence the density distribution of the flow, and thus result in characteristic patterns in the exhaust jet. These characteristic patterns can be reconstructed with the optical background-oriented schlieren (BOS) method in a tomographic set-up, which in turn allows the identification of defects inside the engine through an exhaust jet analysis.The quality of the tomographic reconstruction strongly influences how easily defects can be detect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This turns on a tedious task owing to the wide diversity of methods to implement each one from the aforementioned procedures such as ring method, Henkel Fourier or Fourier expansion techniques for Abel inversion implementation (Kolhe and Agrawal (2009); Pretzier (1991); Fomin (1998)). Besides, in certain applications, multiple mathematical procedures are used in combination to reconstruct the refractive index field (Hartmann and Seume (2016)). Hence, the need for a modular and generic framework that can, in one hand, easily integrate and switch between the different reconstruction functions and, on the other hand, accounts for all possible errors regardless of their possible correlation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This turns on a tedious task owing to the wide diversity of methods to implement each one from the aforementioned procedures such as ring method, Henkel Fourier or Fourier expansion techniques for Abel inversion implementation (Kolhe and Agrawal (2009); Pretzier (1991); Fomin (1998)). Besides, in certain applications, multiple mathematical procedures are used in combination to reconstruct the refractive index field (Hartmann and Seume (2016)). Hence, the need for a modular and generic framework that can, in one hand, easily integrate and switch between the different reconstruction functions and, on the other hand, accounts for all possible errors regardless of their possible correlation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such an approach to be effective, it should be readily expandable into other mathematical procedures. The problem is more acute as the latter noticeably is increasing in number according to specific configurations, such as the use of ART combined with FBP (Hartmann and Seume (2016)) or the use of inverse gradient instead of the Poisson equation when derivation is not possible (presence of an object in the field). Another concern is that this kind of formulas requires the determination of correlation coefficients between errors.…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study will test both the null gradient case and using FBP as an initial guess. The latter has been shown [9,11] to improve the rate of convergence of ART, and reduce its tendency for underprediction, when FBP is an accurate guess of the gradient field. The FBP solution needs to be filtered first to remove artefacts around the object.…”
Section: Implementing Tomographic Bosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak errors of FBP-ART vary slightly more from ART, with a tendency to have a marginally higher error than ART (average 0.1% higher) at 10 iterations and slightly lower peak error (average 0.5% higher) at 100 iterations. The idea of using FBP as the initial solution to reduce ART underprediction by preserving regions of high (or overpredicted) [9,11] is not realised in practice due to the strong artefacts throughout the domain (figure 11), possibly slightly exacerbated by the Gaussian mask which is necessary to reduce the growth of the FBP artefacts. This contrasting result to the previous studies on FBP-ART can be explained in terms of the flow under study.…”
Section: Comparison Of Fbp Art and Fbp-art Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation