2020
DOI: 10.1177/1468018120902597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining cash transfers and parenting programs: Operational design considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of other proximal processes may also mediate the association between socioeconomic risk and child language and the economic status of countries may moderate such effects. These processes include nutrition, pre-and postnatal healthcare, food and housing insecurity, toxicity exposure, the quality and quantity of parent linguistic input, and a nurturing home literacy environment involving early shared book reading (Anderson et al, 2021;Aram et al, 2013;Arriagada et al, 2020;Daelmans et al, 2017;De Bondt et al, 2020;Ellwood-Lowe et al, 2020;Gonzalez et al, 2017). Lastly, it is important to note that a mediation model of language is also potentially confounded by the genetic influence given that parental circumstances (SES, responsivity) and child language can be correlated because of shared genes or because genetically based characteristics of children elicit different degrees of maternal responsivity (Dale et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of other proximal processes may also mediate the association between socioeconomic risk and child language and the economic status of countries may moderate such effects. These processes include nutrition, pre-and postnatal healthcare, food and housing insecurity, toxicity exposure, the quality and quantity of parent linguistic input, and a nurturing home literacy environment involving early shared book reading (Anderson et al, 2021;Aram et al, 2013;Arriagada et al, 2020;Daelmans et al, 2017;De Bondt et al, 2020;Ellwood-Lowe et al, 2020;Gonzalez et al, 2017). Lastly, it is important to note that a mediation model of language is also potentially confounded by the genetic influence given that parental circumstances (SES, responsivity) and child language can be correlated because of shared genes or because genetically based characteristics of children elicit different degrees of maternal responsivity (Dale et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike in other studies, where the reduction of external risks increased the reliability in investment returns and thus investment per child (Gibson and Lawson, 2011), Roma maternal investment decreased with a receipt of welfare. In contrast to other studies, this finding indicates that the extent to which the staterather than the parent(s)bears the cost of rearing children has a negative influence on maternal investment (see Desai, 1995;Del Boca et al, 2014;Arriagada et al, 2020). The Serbian welfare state guarantees the Roma benefits in healthcare, schooling, and social assistance incentives, alleviating hardships to at least a certain extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…A range of other proximal processes may also mediate the association between socioeconomic risk and child language and the economic status of countries may moderate such effects. These processes include nutrition, pre-and postnatal healthcare, food and housing insecurity, toxicity exposure, the quality and quantity of parent linguistic input, and a nurturing home literacy environment involving early shared book reading Aram et al, 2013;Arriagada et al, 2020;Daelmans et al, 2017;DeBondt et al, 2020;Ellwood-Lowe., et al, 2020;Gonzales et al, 2017). Lastly, it is important to note that a mediation model of language is also potentially confounded by genetic influence given that parental circumstances (socioeconomic status, responsivity) and child language can be correlated because of shared genes or because genetically based characteristics of children elicit different degrees of maternal responsivity (Dale et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%