2007
DOI: 10.14358/pers.73.2.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Decision Trees with Hierarchical Object-oriented Image Analysis for Mapping Arid Rangelands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
102
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The segmentation technique in eCognition 9.0 is a bottom-up region merging technique where smaller image objects are merged into larger ones with the scale parameter controlling the growth in heterogeneity between adjacent image objects. The merging is stopped when image object growth exceeds the threshold defined by the scale parameter-the maximum allowable heterogeneity of image object [52]. Adjusting the scale parameter influences the average object size.…”
Section: Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The segmentation technique in eCognition 9.0 is a bottom-up region merging technique where smaller image objects are merged into larger ones with the scale parameter controlling the growth in heterogeneity between adjacent image objects. The merging is stopped when image object growth exceeds the threshold defined by the scale parameter-the maximum allowable heterogeneity of image object [52]. Adjusting the scale parameter influences the average object size.…”
Section: Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The color parameter, ranging from 0 to 1, determines the weight of spectral (color) heterogeneity against shape heterogeneity in the total image object heterogeneity. Previous studies suggest that more meaningful objects are extracted with a higher weight for the color criterion [52,53]. The shape heterogeneity is further defined as a weighted sum of smoothness (the ratio of the border length and the shortest possible border length of the bounding box of an image object) and compactness (the ratio of the border length and the square root of the number of object pixels).…”
Section: Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this approach was less effective in heterogeneous and denser hardwood stands than conifer landscapes [51,56]. For vegetation stands, decomposing landscapes into smaller objects (vegetation stands, a group of trees) and labeling species by the majority classified pixels within segmentations [15], vegetation gradient model adding spectral mixture analysis [30] or non-parametric classifiers (e.g., [18,23]) were usually applied (e.g., [18,[57][58][59][60]). Nevertheless, segmentations in sparse tree stands may not be partitioned well, due to effects of non-vegetation areas or shadows.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed vegetation objects were further partitioned following the image segmentation optimized for delineation of tree density using multiresolution in eCognition 8, which has been extensively used in studies of object-base image classification for vegetation inventories (e.g., [18,58,59]). The algorithm of multiresolution segmentation was demonstrated by optimization procedures to minimize heterogeneity for each individual merging [24].…”
Section: Species Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighty-seven percent of all shrubs greater than 2 m2 were detected with QuickBird, and 29% of shrubs smaller than 2 m 2 were detected. Various categories of grass and bare soils could also be delineated after the shrubs had been masked out of the QuickBird data (Laliberte, Fredrickson, and Rango, 2006). Because the 61 cm resolution from space is very similar to a variety of existing aerial photographs, QuickBird is an important resource for supplementing an aerial photography database.…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%