2019
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography

Abstract: Magnetic resonance-electrical properties tomography (MR-EPT) is a technique used to estimate the conductivity and permittivity of tissues from MR measurements of the transmit magnetic field. Different reconstruction methods are available, however all these methods present several limitations which hamper the clinical applicability. Standard Helmholtz based MR-EPT methods are severely affected by noise. Iterative reconstruction methods such as contrast source inversion-EPT (CSI-EPT) are typically time consuming… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these inverse models require electromagnetic quantities that are not always accessible with MRI (incident electric field) (Balidemaj et al 2015). Better quality conductivity reconstructions from simulated data have been recently obtained with deep-learning based approaches (Hampe et al 2019;Leijsen et al 2019;Mandija et al 2019), but their generalization to in vivo cases remains challenging due to the lack of accurate in vivo reconstructions to train neural networks. Contrary to the studies above, the presented study does not introduce a new methodology for MR-EPT, nor does it aim at solving the noise amplification problem of Helmholtz-based MR-EPT reconstructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these inverse models require electromagnetic quantities that are not always accessible with MRI (incident electric field) (Balidemaj et al 2015). Better quality conductivity reconstructions from simulated data have been recently obtained with deep-learning based approaches (Hampe et al 2019;Leijsen et al 2019;Mandija et al 2019), but their generalization to in vivo cases remains challenging due to the lack of accurate in vivo reconstructions to train neural networks. Contrary to the studies above, the presented study does not introduce a new methodology for MR-EPT, nor does it aim at solving the noise amplification problem of Helmholtz-based MR-EPT reconstructions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge also that the current implementation fails to indicate such type of error. We believe that combining our DL-based reconstruction with an inverse EPT reconstruction method (which guarantees data consistency), similarly to the hybrid approach adopted by Leijsen et al, 53 could increase the confidence in the accuracy of reconstruction of outlier cases.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The ΔT assessment is also altered when individual mesh elements span multiple tissues. This can occur when a hexahedral mesh is not aligned with the voxels of the human model (see, e.g., the material property maps reported in [25]). Such modification of the material properties increases the uncertainty in the model output for voxel-based human body models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%