2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Deep Learning and Graph-Theoretic Brain Features to Detect Posttraumatic Stress Disorder at the Individual Level

Abstract: Previous studies using resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) have revealed alterations in graphical metrics in groups of individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To explore the ability of graph measures to diagnose PTSD and capture its essential features in individual patients, we used a deep learning (DL) model based on a graph-theoretic approach to discriminate PTSD from trauma-exposed non-PTSD at the individual level and to identify its most discriminant features. Our study was performed on r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies by Zhu, Z et al [ 19 ]and Yang et al [ 20 ], combined deep learning and classical support vector machine (SVM) techniques. They employed graphic topological measures based on fMRI data to classify PTSD in adults vs. HC and PTSD in children vs. TEHC, achieving accuracies of 80% and 71.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies by Zhu, Z et al [ 19 ]and Yang et al [ 20 ], combined deep learning and classical support vector machine (SVM) techniques. They employed graphic topological measures based on fMRI data to classify PTSD in adults vs. HC and PTSD in children vs. TEHC, achieving accuracies of 80% and 71.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu et al applied a graph-theoretic approach based on DL to discriminate PTSD from TE. An accuracy of 80% was achieved achieved with 0.81 sensitivity and 0.79 specificity by utilizing informative sets of brain graph measures of the central executive network, salience network, and default mode network 34 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented a two-stage prediction pipeline to differentiate medication responders from non-responders as described in previous prospective studies (Hazlett et al, 2017 ; Zhu et al, 2021 ; Yang et al, 2021 ). A feedforward multi-layer neural network was adopted as the initial stage for dimensionality reduction (Hinton & Salakhutdinov, 2006 ), and SVM was included as the second stage to individually discriminate responders from non-responders (Cortes & Vapnik, 1995 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%