Proceedings of the 41st Annual Design Automation Conference 2004
DOI: 10.1145/996566.996816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining dictionary coding and LFSR reseeding for test data compression

Abstract: In this paper we describe a method to combine dictionary coding and partial LFSR reseeding to improve the compression efficiency for test data compression. We also present a fast matrix calculation method which significantly reduces the computation time to find a solution for partial LFSR reseeding. Experimental results on ISCAS89 benchmark circuits show that our approach is better than either dictionary coding or LFSR reseeding, and outperforms several test data compression methods proposed recently.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table V, the proposed scheme achieves the highest compression ratio in all the circuits, which is enabled by reduction in the number of specified bits. Compared with [23], more compression ratio is observed in the proposed study. Another important advantage over [23] is that the decoder in the proposed scheme is independent of circuit or test data, while [24] requires a dictionary that is dependent on circuit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table V, the proposed scheme achieves the highest compression ratio in all the circuits, which is enabled by reduction in the number of specified bits. Compared with [23], more compression ratio is observed in the proposed study. Another important advantage over [23] is that the decoder in the proposed scheme is independent of circuit or test data, while [24] requires a dictionary that is dependent on circuit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The same test set is employed in [22], [24], and the proposed study, while [23] does not ( [23] employs Mintest test set). As shown in Table V, the proposed scheme achieves the highest compression ratio in all the circuits, which is enabled by reduction in the number of specified bits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fully specified scan-in states of functional broadside tests are not compatible with the most popular test data compression methods [Barnhart et al 2001;Chandra et al 2011;Koenemann 1991;Krishna et al 2004;Lin and Rajski 2012;Pomeranz 2016;Rajski et al 2002;Sun et al 2004;Tenentes et al 2008]. These methods compress tests into initial states (seeds) for a linear-feedback shift register (LFSR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%