2021
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining dynamic XFEM with machine learning for detection of multiple flaws

Abstract: A novel methodology for multiple flaw detection is presented in this study. It combines the dynamic extended finite element method (XFEM) with machine learning for the first time. The extreme learning machine (ELM) is chosen as a learning rule for modeling and prediction. The XFEM is employed to overcome the issues associated with the large quantity of input data required for ELM network training, whereas the ELM itself is used to bypass the time-consuming repeated analyses ordinarily required for the detectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In paper, 145 a novel methodology for multiple flaw detection is presented, combining the dynamic XFEM with the extreme learning machine (ELM) for modeling and prediction. The XFEM is employed to overcome the issues associated with the large quantity of input data required for ELM network training, whereas the ELM itself is used to bypass the time‐consuming analyses commonly used for multiple flaw detection.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In paper, 145 a novel methodology for multiple flaw detection is presented, combining the dynamic XFEM with the extreme learning machine (ELM) for modeling and prediction. The XFEM is employed to overcome the issues associated with the large quantity of input data required for ELM network training, whereas the ELM itself is used to bypass the time‐consuming analyses commonly used for multiple flaw detection.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some interesting works have been reported using physical signals, such as sound wave, electromagnetic wave, and temperature, which are adapted to identify structural defect and damage. [18][19][20] Here, because machining-induced plasticity behavior is highly nonlinear and has multifield coupling characteristics, traditional machine learning methods are difficult to accurately describe or predict its complex evolution process. Hence, considering its powerful data-driven and physical constraint ability, PIML strategy is adopted to investigate the machining-induced plasticity behavior for achieving fast and accurate prediction of dislocation behaviors and optimizing machining parameters with good validity and interpretability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its theories and methods have been widely applied to solve complex problems (especially those of classification and regression) in engineering and applied science. [30][31][32] Jiang et al 33 proposed a novel methodology by combining the dynamic extended finite element method with machine learning for multiple void-like flaw detection; in this method, the extreme learning machine was chosen as a learning rule for modeling and prediction according to the structural frequencies and displacement mode shapes reflecting the positions and dimensions of flaws. de Assis et al 34 solved an inverse crack identification problem using metaheuristic sunflower optimization, artificial neural networks, and the response surface method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%