2019
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining eight research areas to foster the uptake of ecosystem‐based management in fresh waters

Abstract: Freshwater ecosystems are under a constant risk of being irreversibly damaged by human pressures that threaten their biodiversity, the sustainability of ecosystem services (ESs), and human well‐being. Despite the implementation of various environmental regulations, the challenges of safeguarding freshwater assets have so far not been tackled successfully. A promising way forward to stop the loss of freshwater biodiversity and to sustain freshwater‐based ESs is by implementing ecosystem‐based management (EBM), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two integrated modelling studies (Domisch et al 2019;Funk et al 2019) exemplify how different holistic approaches can be used to identify management options which consider ecological integrity biodiversity resilience and ESS (Principle 1). Both implementations of the quantitative model coupling framework for EBM (Langhans et al 2019), confirms how biodiversity and ESS estimates can be jointly simulated within the DRB given the availability of requisite data and models. It demonstrates that the method is very flexible and the criteria and models used are broadly applicable and the approach is transferable to other aquatic systems (Funk et al 2019.…”
Section: Ebm Principlesmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two integrated modelling studies (Domisch et al 2019;Funk et al 2019) exemplify how different holistic approaches can be used to identify management options which consider ecological integrity biodiversity resilience and ESS (Principle 1). Both implementations of the quantitative model coupling framework for EBM (Langhans et al 2019), confirms how biodiversity and ESS estimates can be jointly simulated within the DRB given the availability of requisite data and models. It demonstrates that the method is very flexible and the criteria and models used are broadly applicable and the approach is transferable to other aquatic systems (Funk et al 2019.…”
Section: Ebm Principlesmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A linkage framework approach (Borgwardt et al 2019;Teixeira et al 2019; was used to assess the relationships between different activities within the catchment and their relations to biodiversity and ecosystem services. The potential of EBM was also tested within two quantitative studies following an EBM planning framework based on a generic model-coupling approach proposed by Langhans et al (2019). The workflow consists of three elements a spatial (model-based) representation of (1) biodiversity,…”
Section: The Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Broadening the scope of water planning is a cornerstone of the description of ecosystem‐based management (EBM) by Langhans et al (). The article introduces innovations in eight core research areas for EBM, including modelling species distribution, ecosystem services supply and demand; planning with SMART targets, scenarios and across realms; evaluating and prioritizing management strategies; spatial planning for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services; and quantifying uncertainties.…”
Section: Invigorating Freshwater Conservation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the discussion of fish passageways by Birnie‐Gauvin, Franklin, Wilkes, & Aarestrup, ). Similarly, Langhans et al () draw attention to the importance of evaluating management strategies and quantifying their uncertainties.…”
Section: Advances In Model and Tool Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%