2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining elemental analysis of toenails and machine learning techniques as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for the robust classification of type-2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a unique, non-invasive approach for potentially diagnosing type 2 diabetes in patients was performed through the examination of toenails. Carter et al [54], through a variety of machine learning algorithms, focused on 22 elements, including aluminum, cesium, nickel, vanadium, and zinc, and was able to get an AUC of 0.90 when predicting diabetic status using a random forest model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a unique, non-invasive approach for potentially diagnosing type 2 diabetes in patients was performed through the examination of toenails. Carter et al [54], through a variety of machine learning algorithms, focused on 22 elements, including aluminum, cesium, nickel, vanadium, and zinc, and was able to get an AUC of 0.90 when predicting diabetic status using a random forest model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system can also suggest a precise dose of insulin to intake. Carter et al [97] proposed a noninvasive diagnostic method using concentrations of twenty-two elements in toenails and personal information such as age, gender, and smoking history. The authors used seven different machine learning techniques to perform the robust classification of type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: And Nn Methods For Noninvasive Glucose Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, feature selection was performed using the four competing feature evaluation measures discussed in the Section 4 to select the most informative features from the preprocessed dataset. As recommended in literature [49] , five-fold cross validation strategy was applied five times for feature selection to avoid selection bias. Finally, the feature subsets resulting from four feature evaluation measures were evaluated with the above discussed four different classifiers namely KNN, RF, SVM and DBN.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%