2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12233854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Evolutionary Algorithms and Machine Learning Models in Landslide Susceptibility Assessments

Abstract: The main objective of the present study is to introduce a novel predictive model that combines evolutionary algorithms and machine learning (ML) models, so as to construct a landslide susceptibility map. Genetic algorithms (GA) are used as a feature selection method, whereas the particle swarm optimization (PSO) method is used to optimize the structural parameters of two ML models, support vector machines (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN). A well-defined spatial database, which included 335 landslides … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, hazard susceptibility modeling and mapping is a classification problem, with binary outcomes of the presence and absence of hazards, meaning that measurements assessing the model performance by evaluating the prediction results and accuracy are important [17]. In the literature, the overall accuracy (ACC), precision and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are considered the main metrics by which to evaluate the overall results [8,17,86]. In addition, the confusion matrix is also implemented as a further metric to evaluate the model performances quantitatively and graphically.…”
Section: Model Performance and Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, hazard susceptibility modeling and mapping is a classification problem, with binary outcomes of the presence and absence of hazards, meaning that measurements assessing the model performance by evaluating the prediction results and accuracy are important [17]. In the literature, the overall accuracy (ACC), precision and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are considered the main metrics by which to evaluate the overall results [8,17,86]. In addition, the confusion matrix is also implemented as a further metric to evaluate the model performances quantitatively and graphically.…”
Section: Model Performance and Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) [116] are also employed for assessing the prediction model performance [56,117,118]. It is because the AUC can express the overall predictive accuracy of the employed classifiers used for soil erosion prediction.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up till now, there is no universally agreed upon condition-specific determination of LCF. Studies like [13,28] use ML models to select LCFs for better accuracy. Popular LCFs can be broadly categorized as follow: In the papers we have surveyed, the LCFs, namely slope, elevation, rainfall, distance to rivers, LULC, NDVI, and distance to roads, are commonly used in landslide susceptibility mapping.…”
Section: Landslide Causative Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%