2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2016.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining evolutionary game theory and network theory to analyze human cooperation patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We introduce a new definition of weight in the multiplex network, as follows: . Weights are function of h ij , which is the homophily between nodes, that is the tendency to associate and interact more with similar people 34 , 35 , and the absolute difference of awareness, | aw i − aw j |, between nodes i and j . Thus, when this difference of awareness is equal to zero, nodes will have a weight , only if there is a link between i and j .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We introduce a new definition of weight in the multiplex network, as follows: . Weights are function of h ij , which is the homophily between nodes, that is the tendency to associate and interact more with similar people 34 , 35 , and the absolute difference of awareness, | aw i − aw j |, between nodes i and j . Thus, when this difference of awareness is equal to zero, nodes will have a weight , only if there is a link between i and j .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, in 25 it has been investigated and quantified the impact of the coevolution of the two processes in all the layers of a multiplex network. Coherently with the real nature of multiplex networks 33 35 , it has been taken into account heterogeneity and its impact along with awareness on the epidemic spreading 25 , 36 . Aiming at capturing the complexity of the coevolution, we consider a weighted multiplex network, as social ties between nodes may have different weights reflecting their intensity 37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary game theory has a long history since it is put forward and it has been applied to explain many dynamic evolution phenomenon, such as human cooperative behavior [33], the evolutionary choice of nature [34], and social games [35] etc. Specifically speaking, in terms of human behavior, Marialisa et al [36] used social network and game theory to investigate the evolution of human cooperation based on the perspective of the homophily, and they explained the phenomenon of the "birds of a feather flock together"; Liu and Chen [37] explored the prosocial exclusion and the antisocial exclusion in the human cooperation; Dong et al [38] considered that self-interest, the behavior of others, the reaction to rewards, and the reaction to punishment can effect the cooperation of human behavior; furthermore, some scholars have studied human cooperative behavior from reputation mechanism [39] and moral hazard [40,41]. In terms of the evolutionary choice of nature, Brown [42] considered that game theory not only could be applied to matrix games and social games, it also could be applied to speciation, macroevolution and perhaps even to cancer; Sample and Allen [43] studied the weak selection and large population size in the evolutionary game theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where h ij is the homophily between nodes/human users i and j, that is the tendency to associate and interact more with similar people [22], [63], given by:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%