2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining fMRI and MEG increases the reliability of presurgical language localization: A clinical study on the difference between and congruence of both modalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial relationship between brain areas identified as exhibiting a task induced signal change by BOLD fMRI and MEG is of significant interest, particularly in applications such as presurgical planning (Grummich et al, 2006) where spatial precision is paramount. However, the question of whether BOLD and neuromagnetic signals originate from the same brain location is, to an extent, confounded by the limits of spatial resolution, and the differences between MEG and fMRI.…”
Section: Spatial Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial relationship between brain areas identified as exhibiting a task induced signal change by BOLD fMRI and MEG is of significant interest, particularly in applications such as presurgical planning (Grummich et al, 2006) where spatial precision is paramount. However, the question of whether BOLD and neuromagnetic signals originate from the same brain location is, to an extent, confounded by the limits of spatial resolution, and the differences between MEG and fMRI.…”
Section: Spatial Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously stated, concordance with the IAP is high for TLE, but may drop to 75% or lower in patients with extratemporal epilepsy. Finally, there is evidence that the hemodynamic response in fMRI is suppressed in a sizable number of patients with lesions that result in abnormal vascularization (82,83), making fMRI unreliable in many patients with large gliomas or AVMs. Nevertheless, fMRI provides a cost-efficient, noninvasive method of language and memory localization, and its wide availability makes it a strong contender for eventually replacing the IAP.…”
Section: Fmrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, MEG is not distorted by tissues outside the brain that affect EEG, which may allow for greater spatial resolution and accuracy (85). Finally, MEG may be a powerful tool for identifying receptive language fields that are impacted by dominant temporal lobe resections (68,82).…”
Section: Megmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various modalities, such as the Wada test, fMRI, functional PET, and magnetoencephalography, can be used for non-invasive localization or lateralization of language area(s) for presurgical purposes. The Wada test and fMRI are the most popular of these modalities 5,6,12,24) . Although the Wada test can serve as a useful index of language laterality, it is less useful for localizing language areas.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been frequently used to localize language areas in the brain in a non-invasive manner [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]12,13,15,16,18,19,[24][25][26] . Various paradigms for the presurgical localization of language areas have been developed to replace invasive brain mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%