2016
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining geometric morphometric analyses of multiple 2D observation views improves interpretation of evolutionary allometry and shape diversification in monitor lizard (Varanus) crania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This also highlights the importance of using different views when studying skull shape and interpreting their evolutionary patterns (Openshaw et al . ). Furthermore, when we used a different phylogenetic framework, which essentially rearranged the sampled species into different taxonomic groups (see Method, above), the morphospaces of sebecosuchians (which includes baurusuchids) and other notosuchians remain significantly separated (Godoy et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This also highlights the importance of using different views when studying skull shape and interpreting their evolutionary patterns (Openshaw et al . ). Furthermore, when we used a different phylogenetic framework, which essentially rearranged the sampled species into different taxonomic groups (see Method, above), the morphospaces of sebecosuchians (which includes baurusuchids) and other notosuchians remain significantly separated (Godoy et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To obtain more detailed interpretations of skull shape variation, we used both lateral and dorsal views for the analyses (Openshaw et al . ), with 19 and 17 landmarks respectively (for the position and description of landmarks, see Godoy et al . , fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, ontogenetic allometry of the skull has not been documented in varanids, but phylogenetic allometry (sensu Gould 1966) has been (Emerson and Bramble 1993;Openshaw and Keogh 2014;Openshaw et al 2016). Thus, in the genus Varanus, which varies appreciably in size, tooth row length is isometric, whereas skull width and jaw length are positively isometric (Emerson and Bramble 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This again suggests that the accuracy of 2D data may be influenced by a complex range of factors, that do not only include the magnitude of the differences, but also landmark coplanarity and taxon-specific anatomical variability. Openshaw et al (2017) suggested that "studies restricted to a 2D geometric morphometric analysis of a complex 3D biological structure can combine carefully designed 2D landmark configurations describing alternative planes [e.g., ventral, side and dorsal views] to maximize shape coverage". That may be true, but could also, as in many other cases, be specific to their study.…”
Section: Conclusion: 2d or Not 2d?mentioning
confidence: 99%