2004
DOI: 10.2118/87843-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Gradual Deformation and Upscaling Techniques for Direct Conditioning of Fine-Scale Reservoir Models to Interference Test Data

Abstract: Reconciling multiscale data for reservoir characterization is a crucial issue, because different data types provide different information about the reservoir architecture and heterogeneity. It is essential that reservoir models preserve small-scale property variations observed in well logs and core measurements and capture the large-scale structure and continuity observed in global measures such as well-test and production data.In this paper, we present a new methodology to directly update fine-scale geostatis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this time I believe that it is best to directly optimize on variables that describe the properties of the fine‐scale model rather than the properties of the coarse‐scale model as suggested by Landa [2001]; see also Mezghani and Roggero [2004]. These studies focus principally on random variations within structures that are discrete flow or geological units.…”
Section: Inversion Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time I believe that it is best to directly optimize on variables that describe the properties of the fine‐scale model rather than the properties of the coarse‐scale model as suggested by Landa [2001]; see also Mezghani and Roggero [2004]. These studies focus principally on random variations within structures that are discrete flow or geological units.…”
Section: Inversion Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. 20,21 Conclusions Based on this study, the following principal conclusions are warranted: 1. 34 Curves A and AЈ are pressure and derivative responses, respectively, at the active well, and Curves B and BЈ are pressure and derivative responses, respectively, at the observation well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…If we are to incorporate considerations based on geological modeling, then we believe that it is best to directly optimize on variables that describe the properties of the fine-scale model (Landa, 2001;Mezghani and Roggero, 2004). These studies focus principally on random variations within structures that are discrete flow or geological units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%