2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10503867.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining hydrologic simulations and stream-network models to unveil flow-ecology relationships in a large Alpine catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In combination with HIs, traits can provide a template to create and test large-scale hypotheses regarding flow-ecology responses (Poff and Allan, 1995;McManamay et al, 2015). Although research in this field is growing (Wu et al, 2019b;Goldenberg-Vilar et al, 2021;Larsen et al, 2021;Pompeu et al, 2022b), due to the lack of longterm discharge data and paired biological samples, linkages between the flow regime and biological communities are usually not fully explored. Therefore, setting biomonitoring networks in which communities are sampled more frequently (e.g., covering seasonal variability), over a long and meaningful time frame (e.g., at least 10 years), and with adequate spatial coverage (e.g., relatively close to dams and with paired river gauging) would be beneficial for monitoring and tackling dam impacts on river ecosystems, as well as for identifying future research priorities.…”
Section: Implications For Biomonitoring and Conservation Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination with HIs, traits can provide a template to create and test large-scale hypotheses regarding flow-ecology responses (Poff and Allan, 1995;McManamay et al, 2015). Although research in this field is growing (Wu et al, 2019b;Goldenberg-Vilar et al, 2021;Larsen et al, 2021;Pompeu et al, 2022b), due to the lack of longterm discharge data and paired biological samples, linkages between the flow regime and biological communities are usually not fully explored. Therefore, setting biomonitoring networks in which communities are sampled more frequently (e.g., covering seasonal variability), over a long and meaningful time frame (e.g., at least 10 years), and with adequate spatial coverage (e.g., relatively close to dams and with paired river gauging) would be beneficial for monitoring and tackling dam impacts on river ecosystems, as well as for identifying future research priorities.…”
Section: Implications For Biomonitoring and Conservation Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Fornaroli et al (2019) showed that Baetidae and Rhyacophilidae densities increased with mean monthly discharges in May, June, and September. Furthermore, Larsen et al (2021) demonstrated that taxonomic richness declined with maximum streamflow in nivo‐glacial streams, but increased in pluvial streams. While broad geographical descriptors such as distance from source might have indirect and integrative effects on macroinvertebrate communities, proximate habitat variables, such as hydraulics or water temperature characterising the local habitat of organisms, could be more general predictors of biological responses across different geographical contexts (Huang & Frimpong, 2016; Statzner et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%