2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35989-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining iterative metal artifact reduction and virtual monoenergetic images severely reduces hip prosthesis-associated artifacts in photon-counting detector CT

Abstract: Aim of this study was to assess the impact of virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) in combination and comparison with iterative metal artifact reduction (IMAR) on hip prosthesis-associated artifacts in photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT). Retrospectively, 33 scans with hip prosthesis-associated artifacts acquired during clinical routine on a PCD-CT between 08/2022 and 09/2022 were analyzed. VMI were reconstructed for 100–190 keV with and without IMAR, and compared to polychromatic images. Qualitatively, artifac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While artifacts remain a challenge in medical imaging, the introduction and development of photon counting CT technology represent a promising advancement in overcoming these issues. The unique properties of photon counting detectors provide a pathway to significantly improved image quality, reducing artifacts and potentially transforming CT imaging into an even more powerful diagnostic tool [ 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While artifacts remain a challenge in medical imaging, the introduction and development of photon counting CT technology represent a promising advancement in overcoming these issues. The unique properties of photon counting detectors provide a pathway to significantly improved image quality, reducing artifacts and potentially transforming CT imaging into an even more powerful diagnostic tool [ 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of the current study is that the results from the photon-counting CT scanner were not compared with a conventional CT scanner with energy-integrating detector. Although clinical data were not evaluated as part of this study, and clinical implants can be more complex in shape, size, and composition than the evaluated metal rods, the results show good agreement with previous clinical studies on metal artifact reduction in PCD-CT. [17][18][19][20][21] In addition, the evaluation was focused on ROI measurements in preselected positions. Further studies should also investigate the impact of metal artifacts on clinical tasks, for example, diagnostic performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have found good performance for both iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) and VMI in clinical patient data. [17][18][19][20][21] However, patient studies have their own limitations as they do not allow for an investigation of different acquisition parameters (eg, tube potential) or different types of metal and lack a ground truth dataset for comparison. Furthermore, intraindividual differences between patients prohibit an accurate assessment of the impact of metal artifacts on quantitative CT-number accuracy in different tissues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very common, and it often limits the assessment of cervical structures or structures in the brain. Other clinical studies also suggested the combination of IMAR and VMI for metal artifact reduction in the hip [89] and for dental implants [90].…”
Section: Metal Artifact Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%