2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-022-01489-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining landscape and genetic graphs to address key issues in landscape genetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the former case, we set the number of modules in each spatial cost-distance graph to be equal to the optimal number of modules identified in each corresponding genetic graph. Then, we compared these partitions using the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI, Hubert and Arabie (1985)), following the method described by Savary et al (2022). This index takes its maximal value (1) when two nodes from the same module in one graph also belong to the same module in the other graph.…”
Section: Module Partitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former case, we set the number of modules in each spatial cost-distance graph to be equal to the optimal number of modules identified in each corresponding genetic graph. Then, we compared these partitions using the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI, Hubert and Arabie (1985)), following the method described by Savary et al (2022). This index takes its maximal value (1) when two nodes from the same module in one graph also belong to the same module in the other graph.…”
Section: Module Partitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former case, we set the number of modules in each spatial cost-distance graph to be equal to the optimal number of modules identified in each corresponding genetic graph. Then, we compared these partitions using the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI, Hubert and Arabie (1985)), following the method described by Savary et al (2022). This index takes its maximal value (1) when two nodes from the same module in one graph also belong to the same module in the other graph.…”
Section: Genetic Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence of functional connectivity among amphibian populations has been compiled either using genetic markers and landscape resistance analyses, or with individual dispersal data (Heintzman & McIntyre, 2021; Lowe & Allendorf, 2010). The combination of both approaches in integrative studies has been rarely conducted (Cayuela, Besnard, et al., 2020; Murphy et al., 2015; Savary, Foltête, Moal, & Garnier, 2022), but has great potential to illuminate the relationships between genetic connectivity and demographic parameters. In this line, capture–mark–recapture (CMR) data allow comprehensive characterization of movement patterns by inferring connectivity graphs built from dispersal kernels based on movement records, demographic and geographical information (Reyes‐Moya et al., 2022); these graphs can, in turn, be contrasted with graphs based on genomic information by comparing inferred clusters, connections and node attributes (Savary, Foltête, Moal, & Garnier, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of both approaches in integrative studies has been rarely conducted (Cayuela, Besnard, et al., 2020; Murphy et al., 2015; Savary, Foltête, Moal, & Garnier, 2022), but has great potential to illuminate the relationships between genetic connectivity and demographic parameters. In this line, capture–mark–recapture (CMR) data allow comprehensive characterization of movement patterns by inferring connectivity graphs built from dispersal kernels based on movement records, demographic and geographical information (Reyes‐Moya et al., 2022); these graphs can, in turn, be contrasted with graphs based on genomic information by comparing inferred clusters, connections and node attributes (Savary, Foltête, Moal, & Garnier, 2022). These two methods provide complementary information: While CMR data provide information on movement patterns, these movements do not necessarily result in successful reproduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%