2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Linguistic, Semantic and Lexicon Feature for Emoji Classification in Twitter Dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also engages young learners in comprehension of abstract concepts in communication to communicate thoughts, feelings, and positive responses through emoji (Fane, 2017). In the Indonesian context, Wahyuni and Budi (2018) conducted a study focusing on twitter that builds a computational model to classify the emoji to its language features: semantic and lexicon.…”
Section: Mischievous Grimacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also engages young learners in comprehension of abstract concepts in communication to communicate thoughts, feelings, and positive responses through emoji (Fane, 2017). In the Indonesian context, Wahyuni and Budi (2018) conducted a study focusing on twitter that builds a computational model to classify the emoji to its language features: semantic and lexicon.…”
Section: Mischievous Grimacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous pre-interviews and studies on emojis commonly used to express positive and negative emotions ( Wahyuni and Budi, 2018 ), we selected a smiley emoji with an open smile and smiling eyes ( ), which is most commonly used in online chats to express positive emotions.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Influence Of Positive Emojis On Initial Online Trust Among College Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emojis can be represented in different forms depending on the specific task in which they are used. The emoji-based feature extraction can use various syntactical or contextual relations and can use values of different types [19], [21], [37]. For example, they can use binary representation (0 or 1) referring to whether an emoji exists in a particular instance or not, integer numbers such as counting their occurrences in instances, real number such as their existence likelihood or intensities.…”
Section: Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%