2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2016.7759624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining motion planning and task assignment for a dual-arm system

Abstract: This paper deals with the problem of combining motion and task assignment for a dual-arm robotic system. Each arm of the system performs independent tasks in a cluttered environment. Robot actions are determined to remove potential obstacles and obtain collision-free paths to grasp the target objects. The approach uses the information provided by the motion planner to build a graph structure in order to represent the obstacles to be removed. The graph is used, first, to decide which is the next motion path to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We focus on a subclass of these problems, where we wish to move objects in the presence of movable obstacles. In [18], [19], efficient approaches are proposed for the multi-robot object retrieval problem, assuming permanent object removal and considering one target object at a time, while our planner considers several target objects at the same time and relocates the obstacles within the workspace. Multi-robot rearrangement planning problems [5]- [7] are also closely related to MR-GTAMP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We focus on a subclass of these problems, where we wish to move objects in the presence of movable obstacles. In [18], [19], efficient approaches are proposed for the multi-robot object retrieval problem, assuming permanent object removal and considering one target object at a time, while our planner considers several target objects at the same time and relocates the obstacles within the workspace. Multi-robot rearrangement planning problems [5]- [7] are also closely related to MR-GTAMP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for each pair of a robot R ∈ R and its grasp g M,R ∈ Gr M,R , we find all partially grounded pick-and-place actions ā that move object M to its target region Re M with R as the pick robot (Alg. 1, line [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. For each partially grounded pick-and-place action ā, we find all movable objects that block the pick action of ā and add the corresponding block-pick edges (Alg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current TMP approaches for multi-arm robot systems focus on coordinated planning strategies, and consider simple pick-and-place or assembly tasks. As such, these methods do not scale to complex manipulation tasks [29,40]. TMP for multi-arm robot systems in the context of welding is considered in [1], whereas [40] discusses an approach for multi-arm TMP manipulation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manipulation problems of different nature have been tackled in the literature with different strategies, e.g., the manipulation problem of Navigation Among Movable Obstacles (NAMO) has been addressed in [2,3] using a backward search algorithm, and dual-arm table-top manipulation problems by combining motion planning and task assignment [4]. These robotic applications, like many others, must deal with different sources of uncertainty and the use of sensors and perception strategies may be required, e.g., the studies in [5,6] have investigated the machine robotic cell scheduling problem for manufacturing systems with or without sensor inspection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating π [lines [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]: Actions in π are sent to the relaxed geometric reasoning for the feasibility evaluation [line 5]. Basically, this process tries to figure out whether there is any feasible world to meet the action conditions or not as we proposed in [19].…”
Section: Contingent Heuristic Computation Using Relaxed Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%