2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/zmqt2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining neurophysiological and psychological indicators to understand individual and team cognition and decision-making

Abstract: This chapter provides an introduction to neurophysiological methods from the field ofcognitive neuroscience, and how they may be applied to address research questions in the field ofmanagerial and organisational cognition. The chapter focuses on electroencephalography (EEG)as an accessible and useful tool to expand the theoretical horizons for research on organisationalcognitive neuroscience. We briefly review the cognitive neuroscience methods that have beenpreviously applied to investigate individual and tea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is presently assumed that successful team performance (defined in broad behavioural terms) must rely on shared representation of task structure and rules for interaction and performance (for a detailed discussion, see 29 ). In terms of underlying neural mechanisms, it is assumed that interbrain synchrony or other neural activity relates directly to success, and this is driven either by shared or overlapping bottom-up, sensory processing between team members, or the shared deployment of cognitive resources, such as attention to relevant factors and operations 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is presently assumed that successful team performance (defined in broad behavioural terms) must rely on shared representation of task structure and rules for interaction and performance (for a detailed discussion, see 29 ). In terms of underlying neural mechanisms, it is assumed that interbrain synchrony or other neural activity relates directly to success, and this is driven either by shared or overlapping bottom-up, sensory processing between team members, or the shared deployment of cognitive resources, such as attention to relevant factors and operations 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is presently assumed that successful team performance (defined in broad behavioural terms) must rely on shared representation of task structure and rules for interaction and performance (for a detailed discussion, see 29 ). In terms of underlying neural mechanisms, it is assumed that interbrain synchrony or other neural activity relates directly to success, and this is driven either by shared or overlapping bottom-up, sensory processing between team members, or the shared deployment of cognitive resources, such as attention to relevant factors and operations 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%