Combining Passive and Autonomous Inflow-Control Devices in a Trilateral Horizontal Well in the Alvheim Field

Abstract

Summary In this paper we describe the analysis, test, and design work to deliver an optimal lower completion for a trilateral well by integrating passive and autonomous inflow-control devices (ICDs) (AICDs) at the Alvheim Field offshore Norway. In 2015, both passive ICDs and AICDs were tested in the laboratory with Alvheim fluids at reservoir conditions. The experimental flow testing demonstrated that the AICD chokes gas more efficiently than the passive ICD. The experimental results enabled correct modeling of AICDs in both the reservoir-simulation model and the simpler steady-state inflow model. The following lower-completion strategy was established for the new well: Where the well was close to the overlying gas cap, AICDs should be used, whereas passive ICDs with variable strength were to be used elsewhere to optimize the inflow. During the drilling phase, the steady-state model was updated with the as-drilled information; the lower-completion design for each branch focused on obtaining what was estimated to be an optimal inflow depending on the oil volume per drainage area. A key uncertainty in the design work was whether shaly zones along the wellbore would creep/collapse with time and act effectively as packers. The lower completion covered 7 km of reservoir penetration in the three branches, and 15 unique oil tracers were installed to evaluate the cleanup and the inflow profile along the well. The well started producing in May 2016 and a successful cleanup was confirmed by oil-tracer responses. In August 2016, a restart-tracer-sampling campaign was performed after a 12-day shut-in, and this formed the basis for a “chemical production log.” The tracer-based inflow interpretation was compared quantitatively with the model-predicted inflow and qualitatively to the tracer responses seen during the cleanup. The comparison confirmed that the lower completion works as initially planned. The interpretation further indicated that the upper zone has a lower degree of pressure support than the lower zone, and that the larger shaly sections have creeped/collapsed and act as packers. The well has exceeded predrill production expectations, with an average oil rate of 3375 std m3/d (21,240 STB/D) during the first production year. A large part of exceeding the predrill expectations is attributed to the lower-completion design, where the focus has been to optimize such that the whole well contributes, from the heel to all toes.

Water shutoff and conformance improvement: an introduction

“…Most of these allow little or no control over fluid inflow after they are installed. Common inflow flow devices are basically pipe with a certain number of openings/holes per unit of length (Augustine et al 2008;Daneshy et al 2012;Dikshit et al 2020;Montero Pallares et al 2020) the openings (Al-Khelaiwi et al 2010;Augustine and Meijs 2011;Langaas et al 2019;Li et al 2011).…”

Completion Performance Evaluation in Multilateral Wells Incorporating Single and Multiple Types of Flow Control Devices Using Grey Wolf Optimizer

“…(2) Enhance control over zonal production in comparison to completion scenarios where laterals are kept open hole or completed with just single-type FCDs such as only passive or only autonomous flow control devices. Several successful real-world applications of well completions incorporating multiple types of flow control devices have been reported worldwide e.g., [35][36][37][38][39][40].…”