2016
DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/965/074503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Photometry fromKeplerandTESSto Improve Short-period Exoplanet Characterization

Abstract: Planets emit thermal radiation and reflect incident light that they recieve from their host stars. As a planet orbits it's host star the photometric variations associated with these two effects produce very similar phase curves. If observed through only a single bandpass this leads to a degeneracy between certain planetary parameters that hinder the precise characterization of such planets. However, observing the same planet through two different bandpasses gives one much more information about the planet. Her… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that by comparing CHEOPS and TESS geometric albedos, qualitative information about the cloud particles of an exoplanet can be derived. A similar suggestion was stated by Placek et al (2016) which modelled disentangling scattered and emitted components from a combined Kepler and TESS photometry for revisited Kepler field planets. If the CHEOPS band is brighter than the TESS bandpass, our modelling suggests that an optical wavelength scattering cloud particle is present.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We suggest that by comparing CHEOPS and TESS geometric albedos, qualitative information about the cloud particles of an exoplanet can be derived. A similar suggestion was stated by Placek et al (2016) which modelled disentangling scattered and emitted components from a combined Kepler and TESS photometry for revisited Kepler field planets. If the CHEOPS band is brighter than the TESS bandpass, our modelling suggests that an optical wavelength scattering cloud particle is present.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A good example of the above is the Kepler-13A (KOI-13, KIC 9941662) system, containing an A type host star and a short period (1.76 day) massive gas giant planet Szabó et al 2011;Mazeh et al 2012;Mislis & Hodgkin 2012;Esteves et al 2013;Placek et al 2014). The transit was detected in Kepler data but the star's fast rotation (V sin(I) = 76.6 ± 0.2 km s −1 , Johnson et al 2014) prevents obtaining RVs precise enough to detect the star's orbital motion induced by the transiting companion, as shown by Santerne et al (2012) who were only able to place an upper limit on the RV variability.…”
Section: Astrophysical Uses Of Optical Phase Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kepler-13A is the transiting planet host and Kepler-13B hosts a non-eclipsing stellar companion (Kepler-13BC) on a 65.8 day orbit (Santerne et al 2012;Johnson et al 2014). Esteves et al 2013;Placek et al 2014;Shporer et al 2014;Esteves et al 2015) who used the amplitudes of the two gravitational phase components, the beaming effect and the tidal ellipsoidal distortion, to estimate the transiting companion's mass. There are several factors that contribute to the uncertainty on the derived mass using this method:…”
Section: Astrophysical Uses Of Optical Phase Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models used to characterize self-luminous planets so far have not considered the effects of optical stellar irradiation and reflection, because the objects observed to date are on very wide orbits, and are observed at NIR wavelengths, where reflected light's contribution is negligible. The only measurements made of exoplanet optical albedos have come from phase curves of hot Jupiters (Placek et al 2016). Optical phase curves are available from Kepler and K2 (Esteves et al 2015), and many more will be collected by TESS (Mayorga et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%