2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-48616-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Practical and Dialectical Commitments for Service Engagements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The act of monitoring has a maintenance-like ongoing nature. Extending the approach of, e.g., Kafalı and Torroni (2018) to understand monitoring and responding to failures is future work, as is handling disputes between agents as to the facts (Telang et al 2015) and their effects on coherence. Criado, Black, and Luck (2016) discuss a notion of coherence where they seek to identify consistent sets of norms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The act of monitoring has a maintenance-like ongoing nature. Extending the approach of, e.g., Kafalı and Torroni (2018) to understand monitoring and responding to failures is future work, as is handling disputes between agents as to the facts (Telang et al 2015) and their effects on coherence. Criado, Black, and Luck (2016) discuss a notion of coherence where they seek to identify consistent sets of norms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to a practical commitment, a dialectical commitment D(x, y, r, u) represents a claim made by x to y that if r holds, then u holds; it represents y's expectation of x that x's claim is true [42]. An authorization A(x, y, r, u) says that x is authorized by y to bring about u if r holds; it represents x's expectation of y that if r holds, then x will be able to perform u.…”
Section: Normative Social Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%