Combining spawn egg counts, individual photo‐ID and genetic fingerprinting to estimate the population size and sex ratio of an endangered amphibian

Abstract

According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, 41% of the world's amphibian species are threatened with extinction, making them more threatened than any other vertebrate group nowadays. Given the global amphibian crisis, comprehensive understanding of demographics and population trends of declining and threatened species is essential for effective management and conservation strategies. Counting egg spawns is widely used to assess population abundance in pond breeding anurans. However, it is unknown how such counts translate into robust population size estimations. We monitored the breeding activity of the Natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita), combining egg string counts and individual photo‐identification with Capture‐Mark‐Recapture population size and operational sex ratio estimation. Male Natterjack toads were identified by the pattern of natural markings with repeated ID of the same individual confirmed for 10% of the samples using genetic fingerprinting. We identified 647 unique individuals within a closed study population at Caherdaniel, Co Kerry. Population estimates derived from egg string counts estimated a breeding population of 368 females (95% CI 353–384) and Capture‐Mark‐Recapture estimated a breeding population of 1698 males (95% CI 1000–2397). The female:male sex ratio was conservatively estimated at 1:5 (95% CI 1:3–1:6) where 62% ± 6% of females were assumed to spawn. These substantially departed from any priori assumption of 1:1 which could have underestimated the breeding population by up to 72%. Where amphibian absolute population size estimation is necessary, methods should include empirical survey data on operational sex ratios and not rely on assumptions or those derived from the literature which may be highly population and/or context‐dependent.

Comparing skin swabs, buccal swabs, and toe clips for amphibian genetic sampling, a case study with a small anuran (Acris blanchardi)

“…For example, it has been argued skin swabbing is easier and less harmful to animals than buccal or tissue sampling [ 33 , 36 ], but this method might be difficult for species with drier skin and more subject to contamination from microbiota or conspecifics [ 32 , 33 , 37 ]. However, skin swabbing has been seemingly successfully used in many recent population genetics [ 11 , 38 ], phylogeography [ 39 ], and other studies [ 40 , 41 ].…”