2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining strong lensing and dynamics in galaxy clusters: integrating MAMPOSSt within LENSTOOL

Abstract: Context. The mass distribution in both galaxy clusters and groups is an important cosmological probe. It has become clear in the last years that mass profiles are best recovered when combining complementary probes of the gravitational potential. Strong lensing (SL) is very accurate in the inner regions, but other probes are required to constrain the mass distribution in the outer regions, such as weak lensing or dynamics studies. Aims. We constrain the mass distribution of a cluster showing gravitational arcs … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MAMPOSSt assumes a shape for the 3D velocity distribution (a Gaussian in the current implementation of the method). It has been successfully tested on simulated halos from cosmological simulations that included both dynamically relaxed and unrelaxed halos, and it has already been applied to several data sets (e.g., Biviano et al 2013Biviano et al , 2017bGuennou et al 2014;Munari et al 2014;Verdugo et al 2016;Pizzuti et al 2017;Mamon et al 2019;Sartoris et al 2020).…”
Section: Methodology: Mamposstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAMPOSSt assumes a shape for the 3D velocity distribution (a Gaussian in the current implementation of the method). It has been successfully tested on simulated halos from cosmological simulations that included both dynamically relaxed and unrelaxed halos, and it has already been applied to several data sets (e.g., Biviano et al 2013Biviano et al , 2017bGuennou et al 2014;Munari et al 2014;Verdugo et al 2016;Pizzuti et al 2017;Mamon et al 2019;Sartoris et al 2020).…”
Section: Methodology: Mamposstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 5) observed at zspec = 1.017 ± 0.001 (Verdugo et al 2011(Verdugo et al , 2016. The apparent Einstein radius amounts to θE ∼ 7.1".…”
Section: Selection Of Known Lensesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The apparent Einstein radius amounts to θE ∼ 7.1". A combined dynamical and parametric lensing mass reconstruction carried out by Verdugo et al 2016 suggests that the centers and orientations of the main dark matter halo, the intracluster gas halo and the luminosity contours are in good agreement if fitting an NFW profile for the main group halo and pseudo-isothermal ellipses to the central galaxy halos.…”
Section: Selection Of Known Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAMPOSSt assumes a shape for the 3D velocity distribution (a Gaussian in the current implementation of the method). It has been successfully tested on simulated halos from cosmological simulations that included both dynamically relaxed and unrelaxed halos, and it has already been applied to several data sets (e.g., Biviano et al 2013;Guennou et al 2014;Munari et al 2014;Verdugo et al 2016;Biviano et al 2017a;Pizzuti et al 2017;Mamon et al 2019;Sartoris et al 2020).…”
Section: Methodology: Mamposstmentioning
confidence: 99%