1996
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.5.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining structural analysis of DNA with search routines for the detection of transcription regulatory elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the local structural characteristics of the DNA at the known binding sites, the proposed method was able to make more confident predictions about the presence of binding sites in promoters of co-expressed genes than the sequence-based methodology. These results support previous theories that structural DNA information can improve classifier performance by providing a higher level data source that is explicitly different from the nucleotide sequence itself (7,8). We could also show that some of the novel, CRoSSeD predicted binding sites (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the local structural characteristics of the DNA at the known binding sites, the proposed method was able to make more confident predictions about the presence of binding sites in promoters of co-expressed genes than the sequence-based methodology. These results support previous theories that structural DNA information can improve classifier performance by providing a higher level data source that is explicitly different from the nucleotide sequence itself (7,8). We could also show that some of the novel, CRoSSeD predicted binding sites (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These methods usually rely on different structural profiles, where each profile represents per position in the genome the values of a specific DNA structural property. Based on the structural profiles characteristics of known binding sites, a classifier can distinguish true from false positive binding sites, as was first demonstrated by Karas et al (7). Furthermore, the combination of these structural profiles with a higher order machine-learning classifier has demonstrated improved classification performance of true and false positive binding sites (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steps are (i) TBP slides along DNA (Coleman and Pugh, 1995; Karas et al, 1996; Ponomarenko et al, 1999) ↔ (ii) TBP stops at a TBP-binding site (Berg and von Hippel, 1987; Bucher, 1990) ↔ (iii) the TBP–promoter complex is fixed by DNA helix's bending to the 90° angle (Ponomarenko et al, 1997; Flatters and Lavery, 1998; Powell et al, 2002). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most likely a result of attempting to recognize binding sites independently of their context (Trifonov 1996). Functional context might include the presence of other binding sites, relative position and helical alignment to other binding sites (Fickett 1996), DNA structural characteristics (Benham 1996;Karas et al 1996) such as curvature (Shpigelman et al 1993;Ponomarenko et al 1997), or other local or distant sequence characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%