2019
DOI: 10.1177/1748006x18822224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining system-theoretic process analysis and availability assessment: A subsea case study

Abstract: Hazard identification methods are important tools to verify that the system is able to operate according to specifications under different operating conditions. Unfortunately, many of the traditional methods are not adequate to capture possible dysfunctional behavior of complex systems that involve highly coupled parts, non-linear interactions and software-intensive functionalities. The rather recent method named system-theoretic process analysis (STPA) is one promising candidate to improve the coverage of haz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A hazard analysis made through STPA become the foundation of this study. An extension of STPA is also provided in [43] where it is proposed a new approach named STPA-RAM (Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability). This latter consists in the utilization of a discrete event simulation to transform the feedback control loops into a set of stochastic Petri nets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hazard analysis made through STPA become the foundation of this study. An extension of STPA is also provided in [43] where it is proposed a new approach named STPA-RAM (Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability). This latter consists in the utilization of a discrete event simulation to transform the feedback control loops into a set of stochastic Petri nets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is among the most regulated industries with many comprehensive standards regarding safety at sea, security, health and protection of crew members, and environmental safeguarding [27], also due to the attraction that naval incidents have on media and reputational risks [28]. In these settings, CAST provided a more systematic and comprehensive perspective on accident analysis, helping to discover more problems and defects at different levels in a grounding accident cruise [29]. Specific recommendations have been instructed through CAST, related to blackout, loss of propulsion and near grounding situations in stormy water [28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it explicitly excludes likelihood), which limits its utility in decision-making and makes it not fully compatible with risk-based standards. 7,28,29 Theme: Incorporate Uncertainty STPA is not quantitative and does not consider epistemic uncertainty in the causal model. 30,31 Theme: Scenario-based Analysis STPA does not define any framework for an operational scenario-based analysis, although it could be adapted to be used in such an analysis…”
Section: Stamp/stpa Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%