Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications 2017
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w17-5021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Textual and Speech Features in the NLI Task Using State-of-the-Art Machine Learning Techniques

Abstract: We summarize the involvement of our CEMI team in the "NLI Shared Task 2017", which deals with both textual and speech input data. We submitted the results achieved by using three different system architectures; each of them combines multiple supervised learning models trained on various feature sets. As expected, better results are achieved with the systems that use both the textual data and the spoken responses. Combining the input data of two different modalities led to a rather dramatic improvement in class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the top band of seven systems (accuracies 86.5% to 88.2%), three of the best systems from each team (Cimino and Dell'Orletta 2017;Goutte and Léger 2017;Li and Zou 2017) used the architectures described later in this paper, with the same kinds of base machine learners, but incorporating some variations: for instance, Cimino and Dell'Orletta (2017) additionally used a sentence-level classifier. In the second band of three systems (accuracies 85.4% to 86.4%), all used ensembles (Chan et al 2017;Ircing et al 2017;Oh et al 2017). Interestingly, this band included the highest-ranked system to incorporate deep learning (Oh et al 2017), supporting our earlier observation that a state-of-the-art deep learning architecture for this kind of classification task has not yet been identified.…”
Section: Native Language Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the top band of seven systems (accuracies 86.5% to 88.2%), three of the best systems from each team (Cimino and Dell'Orletta 2017;Goutte and Léger 2017;Li and Zou 2017) used the architectures described later in this paper, with the same kinds of base machine learners, but incorporating some variations: for instance, Cimino and Dell'Orletta (2017) additionally used a sentence-level classifier. In the second band of three systems (accuracies 85.4% to 86.4%), all used ensembles (Chan et al 2017;Ircing et al 2017;Oh et al 2017). Interestingly, this band included the highest-ranked system to incorporate deep learning (Oh et al 2017), supporting our earlier observation that a state-of-the-art deep learning architecture for this kind of classification task has not yet been identified.…”
Section: Native Language Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEMI (Ircing et al, 2017) use a Logistic Regression meta-classifier to achieve their best essay-only results. The meta-classifier is trained on the outputs of several base classifiers, which are trained on TF-IDF weighted word unigrams, word bigrams, character n-grams and POS n-grams.…”
Section: Essay-only Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each team's best system is briefly described below, ordered by rankings. CEMI (Ircing et al, 2017) attained their best result with an ensemble consisting of a SGD classifier trained on transcript word features and a feedforward neural network trained on the i-vector features. The final prediction is selected via softmax combination.…”
Section: Speech-only Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation