2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining the classic vulnerability index and affinity propagation clustering algorithm to assess the intrinsic aquifer vulnerability of coastal aquifers on an integrated scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, a detailed comparison of the two algorithms is given in the "Comparison between affinity propagation and K-means" section below. 46 , and its extension to Hierarchical Affinity Propagation 58 , are nowadays becoming extremely popular due to their simplicity, general applicability, and performance and have been succesfully applied to several contexts in research [49][50][51][52] . AP takes as input the measures of similarity between pairs of data points, and simultaneously considers all of them as potential exemplars.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, a detailed comparison of the two algorithms is given in the "Comparison between affinity propagation and K-means" section below. 46 , and its extension to Hierarchical Affinity Propagation 58 , are nowadays becoming extremely popular due to their simplicity, general applicability, and performance and have been succesfully applied to several contexts in research [49][50][51][52] . AP takes as input the measures of similarity between pairs of data points, and simultaneously considers all of them as potential exemplars.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the situation of the study area and referring to the relevant literature [28,35,37,38], each evaluation indicator of the DRASTIC model is rated as 1, 3, 5, and 7, corresponding to different categories of indicators. The greater the rating, the greater the contribution to groundwater vulnerability (Table 7).…”
Section: Groundwater Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with such models is that they are less accurate, omitting the important variables, and therefore they need to be modified and optimized (Bordbar et al 2019). Based on a recent review of groundwater vulnerability index (GVI) methods, four categories can be distinguished: process-based prediction models (Guo et al 2023), overlay analysis and index-based methods (Wu et al 2018), AI-based hybrid methods (Nadiri et al 2022), and statistical frameworks (Omeje et al 2023). As shown in the table 1, there have been a variety of reviews for GVI methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%