2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002619
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining the Finite Element Method with Structural Connectome-based Analysis for Modeling Neurotrauma: Connectome Neurotrauma Mechanics

Abstract: This article presents the integration of brain injury biomechanics and graph theoretical analysis of neuronal connections, or connectomics, to form a neurocomputational model that captures spatiotemporal characteristics of trauma. We relate localized mechanical brain damage predicted from biofidelic finite element simulations of the human head subjected to impact with degradation in the structural connectome for a single individual. The finite element model incorporates various length scales into the full head… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the metrics used here indicate a global, or macro level, response of the brain in those regions, and for further analysis a local, or micro, model of the vasculature of the SDH ROI may be warranted. 18 In addition, as it was important to discern if the SDH ROI deformations were significantly different from those in the rest of the cerebellum, a t-test was conducted to establish if there were any significant differences between the responses. An ANOVA was conducted across different lobes of the brain for each response variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the metrics used here indicate a global, or macro level, response of the brain in those regions, and for further analysis a local, or micro, model of the vasculature of the SDH ROI may be warranted. 18 In addition, as it was important to discern if the SDH ROI deformations were significantly different from those in the rest of the cerebellum, a t-test was conducted to establish if there were any significant differences between the responses. An ANOVA was conducted across different lobes of the brain for each response variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this inconsistency, recent studies have begun to use strains along WM fibers to characterize elongation of axonal bundles (termed ''axonal'' or ''fiber'' strain, e n ). 11,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Initial evidence suggests that fiber orientation-dependent e n improves injury prediction relative to its isotropic counterpart, e ep :…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Cloots and coworkers 17 and Wright and Ramesh 19 employed a multiscale approach to couple a macroscale three dimensional (3D) or two dimensional (2D) head model, respectively, with a microscale element embedding a single axon. Work from Wright and colleagues, 21 Kraft and associates, 20 Sahoo and coworkers, 26 , and Giordano and Kleiven 27 assigned average FA values and fiber directions to each element from coregistered DTI for strain evaluation. Instead of averaging on elements, Ji and associates 22 evaluated fiber strain at each DTI voxel transformed into the corresponding FE model space using strain tensors from the closest FE element on a subject-specific basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The meshing pipelines provided here may also prove useful for other types of finite-element simulations, such as those evaluating neurotrauma mechanics [40]. The finite element solution used during leadfield creation may also be adaptable for other types of simulations, such as the modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%